Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watch: AI analysis says US Moon landing images are fake (Google AI)
UMMID ^ | 11/27/2023 | Staff

Posted on 11/29/2023 9:21:10 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last
To: The Duke

And which one ran against (and lost) to Nixon?


181 posted on 11/29/2023 6:15:07 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
image host
182 posted on 11/29/2023 6:24:09 PM PST by yelostar (Spook codes 33 and 13. See them often in headlines and news stories. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

Whether it was the LRO or wherever it was that the gathering of the visual information took place, the point is that it has already been proven that the evidence is there and has been since July 20, 1969.


183 posted on 11/30/2023 1:15:08 AM PST by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

You know this, and I know this.

Again. How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?


184 posted on 11/30/2023 6:00:17 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

The very first image of the far side of moon taken on October 7 , 1959. The Soviet Union did not have the technology for the film used to take that picture. The film was from a US spy balloon the Soviets had shot down over their territory.

After the Soviets lost the race to the moon they shut down their program and pretended they were not interested in beating the Americans . One of their rockets was actually converted into a trough to feed pigs on a farm. The Soviets knew they were beat , which is more than I can say for some truly gullible Americans.

185 posted on 11/30/2023 9:47:15 AM PST by Nateman (If the Pedo Profit Mad Moe (pig pee upon him!) was not the Antichrist then he comes in second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

“How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?”

Maybe it’s because they have a hard time believing how something so great could ever have happened without their having been a part of the world in which it happened. They can’t “own it” so they discredit it like the incorrigible bunch of snot-nosed narcissistic bastards that they are.


186 posted on 11/30/2023 10:50:56 AM PST by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
They can try to discredit the obvious proofs, what I’m asking though, is how does one look at the photographs and deny their authenticity? They have to believe the landing site images are faked, along with the contemporary 1960s and 1970s photographs. They’ll have to deny it over and over, because it won’t be too much longer before flights will be routine. NASA has indicated and international agreements have already been signed that basically treat the landing sites as “look but don’t touch”; they are concerned about souvenir hunters, and damaging what are important historical sites.
187 posted on 11/30/2023 3:39:36 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson