Skip to comments.
Watch: AI analysis says US Moon landing images are fake (Google AI)
UMMID ^
| 11/27/2023
| Staff
Posted on 11/29/2023 9:21:10 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 last
To: The Duke
And which one ran against (and lost) to Nixon?
181
posted on
11/29/2023 6:15:07 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
To: Jan_Sobieski
182
posted on
11/29/2023 6:24:09 PM PST
by
yelostar
(Spook codes 33 and 13. See them often in headlines and news stories. )
To: Freedom4US
Whether it was the LRO or wherever it was that the gathering of the visual information took place, the point is that it has already been proven that the evidence is there and has been since July 20, 1969.
183
posted on
11/30/2023 1:15:08 AM PST
by
equaviator
(If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
To: equaviator
You know this, and I know this.
Again. How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?
To: Jan_Sobieski
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Luna_3_moon.jpg)
The very first image of the far side of moon taken on October 7 , 1959. The Soviet Union did not have the technology for the film used to take that picture. The film was from a US spy balloon the Soviets had shot down over their territory.
After the Soviets lost the race to the moon they shut down their program and pretended they were not interested in beating the Americans . One of their rockets was actually converted into a trough to feed pigs on a farm. The Soviets knew they were beat , which is more than I can say for some truly gullible Americans.
185
posted on
11/30/2023 9:47:15 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If the Pedo Profit Mad Moe (pig pee upon him!) was not the Antichrist then he comes in second.)
To: Freedom4US
“How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?”
Maybe it’s because they have a hard time believing how something so great could ever have happened without their having been a part of the world in which it happened. They can’t “own it” so they discredit it like the incorrigible bunch of snot-nosed narcissistic bastards that they are.
186
posted on
11/30/2023 10:50:56 AM PST
by
equaviator
(If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
To: equaviator
They can try to discredit the obvious proofs, what I’m asking though, is how does one look at the photographs and deny their authenticity? They have to believe the landing site images are faked, along with the contemporary 1960s and 1970s photographs. They’ll have to deny it over and over, because it won’t be too much longer before flights will be routine. NASA has indicated and international agreements have already been signed that basically treat the landing sites as “look but don’t touch”; they are concerned about souvenir hunters, and damaging what are important historical sites.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson