Read my first two posts.
I made no claims other than, that -- following your cherry picking, not mine -- the authors had no axe to grind, and were not trying to sell OTC remedies in lieu of the jabs.
Thus dispelling forever the blanket statement that all talk of side effects comes only from tainted, unscientific sources.
Thanks for playing, you do really good at own-goals, like I said.
Troll.
“I did a cursory check that the first links worked, and that they went to recognizable, real journals.”
Fine. I actually read the first seven articles.
“I made no claims other than, that”
I made no claims either. Just quoted from the articles you should have read.