Why didn't you draw the conclusion that perhaps more recent, more comprehensive longitudinal studies might be helpful?
Hint: I've never seen a politician, announcer, newscaster, or the like, have a seizure, or die, on TV, until after the clot shots.
Why doesn't it arouse your suspicions that all the MSM sources of information, all attribute myocarditis, heart attacks, and so forth, to any random factor whatsoever EXCEPT the clot shots?
And why aren't you jumping down THEIR throats for getting the causes wrong, if you are indeed intent on saving lives, and following only peer-reviewed science (unspoken: by people in Pfauci's / Big Pharma's "good graces"):
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/121/497/945/original/d0b7064c81d5b644.jpg
“Why didn’t you draw the conclusion that perhaps more recent, more comprehensive longitudinal studies might be helpful?”
Why didn’t you post more recent articles?
“if you are indeed intent on saving lives, and following only peer-reviewed science”
I was following your lead by reviewing the articles you posted.