[TexasGator]

So far, six of the first six papers in the OP article recommend the vax:

—————Paper #6———————

” Importantly, analyses of this data and their discussion by North American and European health agencies at this early stage conclude that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks in all populations, including the rare risk of myocarditis, for all recommended age groups.”

[grey_whiskers]

I covered that in post #7.

There are 228 papers which discuss myocarditis.

And you forgot to discuss the implications of myocarditis being found in children, within a few days of the shots, in a small sample

since

a) children generally don't get myocarditis

b) children have statistically basically zero risk of dying from COVID-1984.

Troll.

[hopespringseternal]

It’s not at all unusual to find papers with statements in the abstract that completely contradict the data in the article. Papers are written to please the person writing the checks.

[Allegra]

So far, six of the first six papers in the OP article recommend the vax:

Who cares? “Scientists,” just like a lot of people, can be bought.

Pharma salespeople are among the most annoying, slimy people there are.