One purpose of linking to a massive number of papers claiming that they all “prove” something is to overwhelm anyone trying to get at the truth.
Professional antivax propagandists know that the audience they target is unlikely to ever look at the original published papers. And even if they did look, they have no clue what those papers are actually saying.
A debunker of antivax claims really only needs to show that the professional antivax propagandist lied about one paper. Because if they lied about one paper, chances are very high they lied about all of the papers.
Of course, no matter how many papers the supporter of science shows that the the professional antivaxxer lied about, the professional antivaxxer will just claim that all scientists are liars and, therefore, their papers say whatever the propagandist claims they say. And the propagandist will never explain how he/she has so much “insider” knowledge that the entire scientific and medical community—the people who actually do the scientific research—somehow missed.
“One purpose of linking to a massive number of papers claiming that they all “prove” something is to overwhelm anyone trying to get at the truth.”
The truth, according to the first five papers, is that you should get the shot!
(clears throat)
Hearken to us,
exDemMom
PhD of Great Aplomb!
Hearken to us,
Come to us,
Be our Defense
Hearken to us,
from those who would
sell Supplements!
Reveal the Secrets
of Science to us
By the Power
Of Calculus™!
For we know
that none is wiser
than a whore
who shills for Pfizer!
Hearken to us,
exDemMom
PhD of Great Aplomb!
One purpose of linking to a massive number of papers claiming that they all “prove” something is to overwhelm anyone trying to get at the truth.
Uh huh.
I posted this list in contravention of your fatuous claim that
Do you know why professional antivaxxers rarely link or provide valid citations to articles? It's because they DO NOT want anyone to read those articles. I assume you refuse to post the links for the same reason. They especially don't want anyone who understands the articles coming back and revealing how they lied about the content of those articles!
So, now that the cat is out of the bag, and you've been proven to be lying through your teeth,
you double down AND move the goalposts in this thread:
A debunker of antivax claims really only needs to show that the professional antivax propagandist lied about one paper. Because if they lied about one paper, chances are very high they lied about all of the papers.
However, like you stated here,
"I notice that the twitter post only linked to that website, but not to any supposed proof of anything. The failure to provide a link to the actual article is, of course, a huge red flag. Professional antivaxxers *never* want anyone to fact-check. "
So now you're lying about the entire SERIES, as well as those posting them.
Incidentally, mewzilla posted another list on this thread, apparently most-recent to oldest.
It's funny how both you and the other trolls are
a) dismissing the entire list while having a fit of the vapors
or
b) Cherry picking a couple quotes from the earliest papers, ignoring the implications that clicically detectable cardiomyopathy was being picked up IN CHILDERN (statistically zero risk of death from the coof, so no need for the clot shots) after only a few days.
So that proves, by your own rule, that you're probably lying about all the rest of your assertions.
Your fellow troll also proved you a liar when he posted a cherry-picked quote from an early paper upthread,
The authors seek not to frustrate vaccination efforts, but rather to prepare patients and providers for a rare but potential adverse effect. Furthermore, the authors hope the dramatic improvement in all four patients will reassure those who do suffer from myocarditis following vaccination.
Contradicting now and forever, your claim that anti-vaxxers are just trying to promote their own alternative quack products -- for example, your probably legally actionable claim against your (claimed) mentor Dr. Malone,
that
He also has a personal website where he promotes a scientifically unsupported and highly questionable Covid treatment protocol and sells "supplements" which he promises will rid your body of spike protein remaining from infection or vaccines. (No scientific evidence for this, of course. Proteases in your body destroy spike protein.)
BTW, you never did respond to my peer review article showing that nattokinase chews up spike protein in vitro The paper was published in Japan, outside of Pfauci's reach.
Let's see if your world-class acess to medical journals can help you find it.
Oh, wait, almost forgot.
CALCULUS!
Dingbat.