jonrick46 wrote: “I know the antivax movement started with the smallpox vaccination. They claimed that the vaccine was “unchristian” because it came from an animal. For other anti-vaccinators, their discontent with the smallpox vaccine reflected their general distrust in medicine. Some skeptics alleged that smallpox resulted from decaying matter in the atmosphere. People also objected to vaccination because they believed it violated their personal liberty, a tension that worsened as the government developed mandatory vaccine policies. The Anti Vaccination League and the Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League formed in response to mandatory laws, and numerous anti-vaccination journals sprang up. People like Robert Malone could have written some of them.”
Most of those opposing the mRNA vaccines claim not to be against all vaccines just these vaccine. However, one is lead to doubt that claim when one sees these are making the same anti-vaccine claims made through out history.
For example, they claimed the original small pox vaccine would turn one into a cow. Similar to today’s claim that mRNA changes your DNA.
Another example, they claimed the small pox vaccine contained bat feces while now they claim the mRNA vaccines contain poison.
How can you claim not to be anti-vaccine when you make the same claims against all vaccines?
. I don't know. I'll have to read post #93 again.
Leave it to Dung Beetle to drag feces into the conversation.
By the ear.
OK, Dung Beetle, so how many people objecting to the clotshots, were alive when the smallpox vaccine was developed?