I don't know Dugway Duke. Should I know him?
You seem to discount the observations of a heart specialist who is trying to help heart patients.
I discount what a cardiologist says on the subject of infectious disease for the same reason that I discount what an infectious disease specialist says on the subject of cardiology.
Area of expertise is everything.
In addition, when someone is saying stuff that none of the experts are saying, which contradicts the body of evidence collected by tens of thousands of scientists, and cannot be confirmed scientifically, I dismiss that stuff.
McCullough is an author on 46 publications regarding Covid. Some of them seem to be genuine science-based articles on kidney, heart and vascular damage caused by Covid infection or on the challenges of treating heart disease patients who catch Covid. Others are questionable, for example, a review on molecular biology and immune responses which uses information from a lot of articles to build a narrative of vaccine harm, without actually presenting any experimental evidence to support the narrative. (He is not a molecular biologist or immunologist.) He uses VAERS as a primary data source, without validating any VAERS reports with medical records. And so on.
No, there is no reason to take McCullough seriously.
VAERS is supposed to be a smoke alarm, Dingbat.
NOT something you put a soundproof pillow over.
Remind me again of how the government treated the Swine Flu Vaccine, and the number of VAERS reports before they moved on it.
You know, because Immunology and everything.
Also, explain to me why the # of reported cases of the flu (and or colds, whatevs) dropped to near Zero during the covid-1984 scare