You haven’t read a single document that I have linked, have you? You didn’t even try to read my explanation of the purpose of 1-methylpseudo UTP in the synthesis of mRNA for vaccines, did you? You didn’t bother to even glance at the linked papers describing why the researchers made 1-methylpseudo UTP substituted mRNA at all, did you?
Here is a bit of advice: if you want to discredit me, you are going to have to systematically refute (with evidence) every link I have provided and every scientific fact or explanation that I post.
Personal insults do not count as scientific refutation of the facts I have stated.
Can you do that?
I doubt it.
ROFL!
You are already discredited because there never was a grave risk to everyone, which was the rationale for the hurried testing, short cuts, and attempted mandates struck down by the Courts.
And because the clot shots don’t work as advertised. (”100% effective” quickly degenerated to the point that the powers that be
be, had to change the very definition of a vaccine, to keep the fraud from sticking out like a sore thumb.)
And, because the clot shots have a vast number of (should have been anticipated by the trials, but oops, the trials were cut to miniscule size and duration, and then lied about) side effects; then should have been caught by VAERS (not meant to be proof, but a smoke alarm), but that was ignored; then all kinds of man-in-the-street effects which you do your feeble best to ignore and dismiss.
I don’t have to refute anything with what you call evidence. It’s like Iiowahawk said:
1. Identify a respected institution.
2. kill it.
3. gut it.
4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.
You have thrown away all credibility of all medical and pharmacological institutions because you have ignored Feynman’s dictum, “You are the easiest person to fool.”
Let us know what Dr. Malone writes back to you.
Be sure to include both your text and his response, with all potentially personally identifying information reacted, of course.