Replies

Not much to add to this absurdity other than to address something seldom addressed.

“Within the jurisdiction”

There are interesting consequences of this. A foreign diplomat with spouse gives birth to a child on US soil. No, that child is not a NBC because when a foreign citizen presents their diplomatic credentials to the State Dept they become a diplomat, and this places them outside the jurisdiction of the US.

It is why famously UN diplomats would park illegally near the UN building in NYC and never pay the parking tickets that accumulated to $1000s. They were immune. Not subject to local jurisdiction.

Also famously, but hushed up, was the father of the present King of Thailand. He was king before the present king. And he was born of royal parents who were students at Harvard. Thus he was born in Massachussets. His parents, though royal, never submitted diplomatic credentials to State. So their child was born within the jurisdiction of the US. He became King of Thailand, maybe the most popular and revered King they have ever had, and he was a natural born US citizen (which was hushed up because of the politics of it in Thailand).

Further, re jurisdiction, the Japanese in WWII temporarily occupied some islands in the Aleutian chain. Alaska at that time was US territory (not yet a state) like Puerto Rico. Being born there made the child a natural born citizen, within the jurisdiction of the US.

But not in the Japanese occupied territory. There were some babies born during that time and they were not natural born citizens because they were outside US jurisdiction — which is the only determinant for natural born citizen. Courts later ensured they were given “full” citizenship status, but since none ever ran for president, the totality of the loss of jurisdiction was never explored.