Replies

Over that past 6 years since Q, and some before Q, I’ve believed a lot of crazy theories, many of which have proven to be true, and many of which are beginning to be proven true as more evidence is uncovered.

I’ve had a lot of crazy theories of my own, many of which are also showing more evidence. Here is one of my “craziest” theories to date. It’s a THEORY. I’m not claiming (yet) that I’m right. But intellectual honesty requires me to consider it as a possibility. I’m hoping your intellectual honesty is also sufficient to consider it.

Crazy theory:
Version 1: What if Hitlery is really a white hat? !!!
Variation 2: What if Hitlery is a gray hat? (I.e., she used to be Deep State, but has repented and is now working for the good guys.)
Variation 3: What if the Hitlery we see today is really not Hitlery, but a body double? (... and the real Hitlery is in prison somewhere or has been executed for treason or something.)

Here are my data points, observations, musings, and tidbits of evidence that have caused this speculation.

1. Controlled opposition. We all know that the Deep State has run BOTH candidates for decades, maybe centuries. We know that Bush/Gore was never a real choice, but a choice between 2 Deep State candidates. (Another theory/discussion for another day is that Bush was/is really on our side.) So why wouldn’t the white hats use the same tactic? Why not run Trump as a candidate, but also run Hitlery against him so that no matter who won, we’d have a white hat in the White House?

2. In 2008, 0vomit came out of nowhere. There was a measure of desperation and scrambling to force him on us as a candidate. At the time, he was running against Hitlery in the primary. It really looked like it would be Hitlery before the primary, so why wouldn’t the DS just allow “their Hitlery” to run/win? Assuming also that no name was the opposition, they would have had both candidates in their pocket. Again, I can also think of arguments regarding no name as a white hat!!! But if both no name and Hitlery - two of the most Q-hated people ever were really secretly white hats, the DS would desperately need to stop this. Enter 0vomit. They were forced to hastily come up with a candidate that had no paper trail of credibility. They had to forge a BC, and make up all sorts of stories about his fake past. They had to cover up a damning paper trail of passports, book deals, etc. They had to make up a fake college history where no one can remember him. Why would they scramble to do all of this - and do a poor job of it in their haste - if they could simply run Hitlery who was already in their pocket?

3. But, but, but.... Q drop #1!

What better cover for a white hat than to convince us all that she’s a black hat! In Q#1, it’s NOT Q who is saying that HRC will be arrested. Q is reposting someone else’s claim that she will be arrested. So that gives Q an out. Also, “war is deception”. Is everything that Q has ever posted true? (I would like to think so, but that is a topic for another long post.)

4. Remember the boot (covering an ankle monitor?) that HRC wore? Remember the back brace or whatever she was wearing and trying (unsuccessfully) to cover up with scarves? Remember the theory that it was some sort of device the white hats forced her to wear in order to control her? All those theories could be true.... or they could be another level of cover to convince us all that HRC is a derp.

5. Post-Q, Post-Storm. Another thing I’ve thought about for a LONG time is how we are going to heal and be united when all of this is over and the truth comes out. I’ve thought about how hard it will be for me to not say “I told you so” to all of the lefties, blue pills, black pills. Recently I’ve begun to think about how hard it might be to not have a sort of “underclass” of people who are permanently shamed because they were on the wrong side of this operation. How would we live post-Q surrounded by family/friends/neighbors who are perceived as sort of “nazi collaborators”? But what if there were something that could take us down a notch? Show us that we weren’t right about everything? Show us that our brothers and sisters on the other side were right about some things where we were seriously mistaken? Show us that we, too, have been duped? That would force us to acknowledge how easy it is for someone (even us!!) to be duped and would (hopefully) give us some understanding / empathy / grace toward those on the “other side”. If we have been seriously wrong about HRC and she is actually a “hero” of the Q op, that would be one of those things. We would have to admit we were wrong about a lot, about something super important.

—

I’ve been pondering this theory as a possibility for a LONG time, and I admit it’s hard to get past my instinctive dislike for HRC. Is that because she’s really a derp? Or is she really a good actor? Is the Q op is so good that they’ve successfully convinced me that she is a derp?

—

I’m posting this as a point to consider. I am hoping that this does NOT create animosity on the board. I am hoping that I have successfully conveyed the idea that I’m not pushing this as truth. I am certainly not convinced of it myself! I’m just open to the possibility. I am hoping that we can discuss this as a theoretical possibility, not as a sort of religious dogma that must be accepted or rejected, proven or disproven. I think we will eventually find out the truth. Soon, I hope.