Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/25/2023 7:15:35 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grundle

Somebody actually did the math instead of doing the knee-jerk ‘green thing’. Shocking.


2 posted on 09/25/2023 7:16:36 PM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

That’s the green movement in a nut shell


3 posted on 09/25/2023 7:16:52 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Grant money ran out, and the grad student interns needed real jobs to pay back their student loans of $250K only to make Leggo Bricks.


5 posted on 09/25/2023 7:20:50 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
As anyone with a modicum of technical knowledge knows, with enough energy, anything can be recycled.

Anyone who likes recycling must like inexpensive energy.

6 posted on 09/25/2023 7:23:29 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Keep going with the old foot penetrators. Future generations deserve the fun also.


7 posted on 09/25/2023 7:23:57 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

If lego was sincerely concerned about their impact on “climate change”,
they would simply cease production of the product.


10 posted on 09/25/2023 7:38:47 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
Since then, however, Lego has found that making bricks from the recycled material would require investing in new equipment and involve more steps, which would ultimately lead to more planet-heating pollution than the status quo, a company spokesperson told CNN Monday.

Ah, well then it is time for them to shut down operations until and unless they come up with a better solution. I mean, why is it okay for them to continue contributing to this "crisis" in the mean time? If it is a crisis, drastic measures must be taken.

11 posted on 09/25/2023 7:40:23 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
LEGO Faces Boycott Following Pride Campaign
13 posted on 09/25/2023 7:53:33 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Vacate the chair. Shutter the government until it can be correctly defunded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

They should go with the method that is most cost effective.
CO2 doesn’t heat the planet and plants crave it.


14 posted on 09/25/2023 8:14:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Lego tolerances are simply too tight to use cheap plastic.


16 posted on 09/25/2023 8:31:00 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
However, Lego is “not abandoning [its] effort to make oil-free bricks” and remains “fully committed to making Lego bricks from sustainable materials by 2032.”

Sounds like they just want to make Lincoln Logs.

17 posted on 09/26/2023 2:21:10 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I’ve worked in the container production industry for over 40 years, and in the PET bottle production industry for the last 25 years.

This is the tip of the iceberg of the folly that is the recycling movement.

There is an un-stoppable push for the global beverage industry to switch to 100% recycled PET, rPET, from 100% virgin PET resin.

There are a number of problems with this:

1. PET containers are not infinitely recyclable. The material oxidizes and gradually turns an unattractive shade of yellow, necessitating adding colorant to cover this up which causes processing problems and increases the cost

2. It doesn’t stretch as well, which creates defects and causes more scrap. (increasing the cost)

3. The rPET resin costs 30% more than the virgin PET

4. It takes 30-50% more energy to produce it

All of this makes it an insane choice from a performance, economic, and “Carbon Footprint” standpoint. (If one believes in the global hoax that is the carbon footprint / climate change movement.)

The global beverage industry is well down the road into this process with no end in sight.

It is the definition of insanity.


18 posted on 09/26/2023 5:07:49 AM PDT by Sisyphean Gardens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

oil is sustainable. It takes a LONG time, but it is a natural product of the environment.


19 posted on 09/26/2023 7:30:18 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Also, once you make a lego, it exists for ever. People hardly ever throw them out, they are highly coveted.

So why would an environmentalist be mad that a lot of oil is locked up in lego bricks? Isn’t that like “carbon capture” at it’s best?


20 posted on 09/26/2023 7:31:43 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson