Posted on 09/12/2023 5:24:58 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Conservative establishment journalists are hardly making a secret of their revulsion for the populist Right. In fact they are wearing that contempt proudly, as a badge of honor. The New York Post has just offered selections from American Breakdown, a book-length social commentary by Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker. This impressionistic study of why “America doesn’t trust itself,” begins its litany of complaints with what should be a predictable gripe: “And yes, let’s acknowledge it: Trump and his friends have surely played a part in undermining trust in recent years with their stream of falsehoods about stolen elections and other bogus claims.” Since Baker in the next several paragraphs tells us about the dishonesty of the media and the Deep State, how can he be sure the outcry of the populist Right against a rigged election in 2020 are uniformly false?
An even less subtle attack on the populist Right has come from neoconservative columnist Douglas Murray who last week wrote a commentary with the title “Pence Can’t Turn the Clock Back on the Republican Party.”” According to Murray, “the problem was not in the program” pushed by the Trump administration. The “problem” was that neither Trump nor his followers would accept the hard work of selective, delicate reform. Because Trump failed in this task, “a new generation of GOPers believe it isn’t worth performing the careful surgery.” Moreover, “There is a type of conservative who has become a type of revolutionary. They want to blow up half the country’s institutions and tear down the other half. Not unlike their opponents on the left. The FBI isn’t working as well as we’d like? Let’s burn it down and salt over the earth. The Department of Education is inefficient and too controlled by the teachers’ unions? Destroy the Department of Education.”
Obviously, populism is as much of a problem for Murray as it is for the explicitly anti-populist Pence, whom Murray hypocritically scolds for his negative remarks on the subject. For Murray and our former vice-president, favoring the dissolution of the Department of Education (which Reagan promised to shutter), is an “unconservative” outrage. But why exactly is the call to abolish a department created by the Carter administration, as a favor to teachers’ unions, and which now vigorously pushes LGBT instruction in public schools a reckless, “revolutionary” act. And why is it equally revolutionary (perhaps I should say “insurrectionary’) to call for the abolition of the FBI, which has been so weaponized by the Left that it may be beyond “delicate” tinkering with. The FBI is not a constitutionally established branch of our government, like the judiciary, which the Left has also weaponized. The FBI is a federal agency that was placed under the Department of Justice. Why is the proposal from some on the right to abolish this dangerously politicized surveillance agency tantamount to calling for scorched-earth war against the Left?
There is a settled view among establishment conservatives and a fortiori among neoconservatives that political institutions created or occupied by the Left should be treated as sacred by virtue of having been around for a while. These institutions, if kept, may even yield jobs for one’s friends or relatives. In any case, defending pillars of government overreach bespeaks “moderateness” and an indication that the defender can be invited to gatherings with liberal celebrities without causing social embarrassment.
Recently while reading in Tablet an otherwise engrossing article “The Bronze Age Pervert’s Dissertation on Leo Strauss,” I was struck by this gratuitous dig at the Claremont Institute for taking the populist side in the current struggle for the soul of the Right:
“In recent years, a set of wholly immoderate West Coast Straussians have convinced themselves that America needs a Trumpist revolution to reclaim ‘the republic’ from the progressive-bureaucratic ‘regime,’ election results notwithstanding. Divided between hapless moderates and unhinged reactionaries, the American Straussian project seems to be unraveling.”
While East Coast Straussians, according to the author, are prone to “soporific lectures,” the more riotous West Coast Straussians have become menacing reactionaries. The attack by the author, Blake Smith, does nothing to advance our understanding of the Bronze Age Pervert’s dissertation, but it may be designed to show that the writer seeks establishment conservative respectability and pursues that while writing for an unabashedly neoconservative site. But why is someone an “unhinged reactionary” for resisting a “progressive-bureaucratic regime” which is subverting our constitutional freedoms and harassing and persecuting its political opposition? Perhaps establishmentarians don’t regard what the Biden administration has done to weaponize entire departments of the government and turn surveillance agencies against critics of the Left as something that calls for serious pushback.
This may be the key difference between what is now referred to as the populist Right and the conservative establishment. Those who grouse too loudly about our current political condition may distress our “moderates” even more than the only mildly objectionable Left.
The RINOs always fold to pressure from the left so what good are they?
Conservative establishmentarians = Leftist infiltrators
Acting like punks where there's no repercussions is not bold.
You mean the left/Rinos/cowards
The Bush Rule: “Attacking your base is not a winning strategy”
Awww, isn’t that cute: the uniparty doesn’t like us.
The quicker MAGA separates from the current conservative movement, the better. Leave it for the 15% of the country who believes in useless war, global aggression, runaway spending and crony capitalism. If left to their own, conservatives couldn’t get elected dog catcher.
That's the crowd that covered themselves with s%!@ so often and for SO long that they have no credibility any more.
They will NEVER recover! To cite THEM as in any way representative of Conservatism is the height of some laughably ‘out of touch’ political hacks.
Bushbots and their Zeeper cousins hate Trumpers and Ukraine doubters more than the purple hair moonbat left. Hopefully! THe next round of boosters will finish them off.
This writer is too smart by half. I had to look up the word fortiori. Then there is ‘Straussian’. Sorry I don’t have time to read the fella.
Nobody cares what these precious thinkers think. The American people don’t have time for drawing room nuances.
There is no such thing as the conservative establishment and elitist Republicans birthed the populist movement…
barf alert!
There are not two political stances, and not actually two political parties, though the "establishment" wishes to reinforce this notion.
Those portrayed as "Conservative establishmentarians" are those who derive their income and sustain their sinecures through pretense. Without a clear definition and understanding of what it is to be conservative, the whole game collapses.
As it should.
Look at how the media has played the whole game most recently.
Barack Obama, conservativeOnce language is debauched, one may assert anything. This is why "cui bono" is one of the correct inquires for all time.
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/11/22/barack-obama-conservative/Barack Obama: Conservative, Pragmatist, Progressive
Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv1k13b0mObama scolds 'petulant' Trump but reveals conservative sympathies
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/16/obama-a-promised-land-memoir-trump-interview
Once Obama is at least in part said to be "conservative" while "progressive," the media "establishmentarians" have shown that they are only focused on feeding themselves -- off of "people" while showing contempt that a "populist" group -- people -- would disagree with their betters.
Language is important for clarity. And language is important by which to lie through one's teeth. Skepticism is recommended.
"Who benefits" is always a nice place to begin....
This is why Trump needs to form a new MAGA party.
He had over 80 million votes. The current GOP party only has 30 million members.
It would not be a 3rd party spoiler, it would be the BIGGEST party.
Most, if not all, of his voters would join (would you stay ‘loyal’ to the feckless GOP?) Even some democrats- who are watching their party go insane- would join. Many Independents (like me) would join.
I don’t like either party, but now I can’t vote in any primary to unseat an incumbent. (That’s how AOC got her seat)
The left is murderous. It has been seen again and again throughout history. The left is evil, yet somehow the right gets the blame. The right has never to my knowledge become authoritarian killers.
The only thing the GOP was ever successful at was getting conservatives believing that republicans are conservatives.
This political party would be dead if people realized the truth.
I do hope it just dies. We need to be done with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.