Thanks Red Badger. Nice pix!
Posted on 09/07/2023 12:40:30 PM PDT by Red Badger
“teaching the peasants how to fight with their farm implements and scavenged swords and spears against the bandits who plagued them. Peasants won”
Gets repeated a bit in the movie Magnificent Seven. Not a bad remake of the Japan stuff. One of my favorite Westerns.
Very minor hobby of mine is studying Roman weapons and tactics. When used properly they were hard to beat.
Why not steel blades? The Romans used steel for lots of their weapons and armor. Steel of one kind or another has been around for a very long time.
Numerals! Who the heck doesn't love numerals?????
BCE
Before Christ Existed...
They can’t escape it...
Magnificent Seven was a western version of Seven Samurai, another Akira Kurosawa production.
Aqueducts, paved roads, non-idealized sculpture, a bureaucratic hierarchy later incorporated into the Catholic Church, linguistic influences from Moscow to Lisbon, the idea of an empire that had representative republican centralized government of all its provinces, and which adopted much of the culture of the conquered and enslaved Greeks and some of the conquered and enslaved Judaeans, the stripes on Jewish prayer shawls and the custom of leaning to the left while eating and drinking at the Passover feast...their version of slavery...drunken orgies and decadence...
What didn’t the Romans give the world.
Baseball?
Kung Fu and acupuncture, movies, TV, jazz, blues and the Internet.
But they did give us barbaric blood sports.
Swords short like that are deemed short swords and require NFA approval. These are illegal and must be destroyed, confiscated …
This means the people who hid the weapons probably were run thru by a sword.
I saw that too.
I don’t know when ‘steel’ was invented..............
What would Biggis Dikus use? A short gladius? You jest!
Which brings me to one of my hobby horses:
We already agree that our calendar is wrong, off by anywhere from 2 to 16 years, depending on who's doing the reckoning, and further in error because of the absence of a year zero.
The more fundamental point is that God did not intend us to mark His years by the birth of Jesus.
If He had intended this we would have a Biblical fixing of the date.
Further, the day of Jesus' birth is unremarkable as all men are born.
However, very few return from the dead, that event is remarkable, and it is the defining moment of Christianity, the very moment of proof that his sacrifice was not in vain. And the Bible gives a precise reference for when this happened!
Clearly this was the date the calendar was supposed to start!
For extra points, this makes our calendar off by anywhere from 17 to 30 years. That makes this something like Holy Year 1993 to Holy Year 2007, giving us at best 7 years to get our affairs in order before the real end of the millennium...
Well, I don’t want to use the Muslim or Jewish, or Chinese calendars, so people can call it whatever era they want. I know who Christ was/is so I’m not going to get triggered and my panties in a wad by BCE or CE; now if I had to use the Muslim calendar, it would be an issue.
Somewhere in ancient Roman records, there's a report of a boating accident.
Exactly so. If people want to interpret it as Before the Common Era, they can do so. I’ll continue to use, “Before the Christian Era.”
‘Face
;o]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
