Don't blaspheme.
The death of Christ was sufficient to pay for all sins, ever. And with it, the promise of a restored relationship and life with God forever.
The volunteering of a Holocaust victim was a temporary reprieve against being executed by Nazis. Didn't do jack squat beyond that.
And again, you are wrong because you are ignoring the words of Jesus:
29Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground apart from the will of your Father. 30And even the very hairs of your head are all numbered. 31So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.
So He knows all about evil, and somehow it doesn't bother Him, in terms of affecting His trust in God.
The volunteering of a Holocaust victim was a temporary reprieve against being executed by Nazis. Didn't do jack squat beyond that.
You make an interesting distinction between the two acts - a distinction that deserves further examination and inquiry.
I'm going to jump ahead here and, instead of asking you to explain WHY one pure act of Love and Compassion should be considered superior / more efficacious than another and make a bold assumption (though only to save time; I certainly don't want to put words in your mouth, but getting the relevant details from you people is like sometimes like pulling teeth: you folks never volunteer explanations, just brash assertions):
Christ's sacrifice - though not necessarily more self-less or more painful than, e.g., Maximilian Kolbe's (one could even argue that an Imperfect Man making a sacrifice of that magnitude, merely to stay the execution of another prisoner, deserves more credit than a Perfect Man doing it to Save the Whole World) - was more efficacious (in effecting the Forgiveness of Sins, Redeeming Mankind, etc.) merely because it had been so ordained.
Right?
Because God the Father had ordained: Christ dying on the Cross shall be considered sufficient!
God the Father could, instead, just as easily have ordained: Christ pricking his thumb and shedding a drop of blood shall be considered sufficient!
And before you mention Christ having risen from the dead (in case you think that that was somehow integral to the Forgiveness of Sins): There are Biblical accounts of people rising from the dead both prior to and after the Crucifixion, so I don't see what is so special about that.
Regards,