[alexander_busek]

You sure use a lot of words to try to cover the fact that you apparently have no idea what kind of god would please you.

That would be digressing from the topic at hand.

1. To begin describing my own personal theological and philosophical preferences would unnecessarily expand the scope of this discussion and make it unmanageable.

2. I don't have to be a chicken to critique an egg. I don't have to propose a better worldview to criticize someone else's worldview. (Though I did, in broad strokes, do so: Eliminate all suffering, or at least check all natural catastrophes, etc.)

Let's instead stick to the subject at hand.

Regards,

[Elsie]

1. To begin describing my own personal theological and philosophical preferences would unnecessarily expand the scope of this discussion and make it unmanageable.

Yet you want others to delve into THEIR personal reasonings that GOD comes off as a meany in your mind.

[Elsie]

I don't have to propose a better worldview to criticize someone else's worldview.

Better?

I seems you have NO 'worldview' as it's not been posted as to what kind of god will suit you.