The Big Question is why do they want us to believe?
Posted on 09/02/2023 5:03:04 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
A Stanford University pathology professor said, "Aliens have been on Earth for a long time and are still here," and claims there are experts working on reverse engineering unknown crashed crafts.
Dr. Garry Nolan made the bold statements during last week's SALT iConnections conference in Manhattan during a session called, "The Pentagon, Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Crashed UFOs."
The host, Alex Klokus, said that's tough to believe and asked him to assign a probability to that statement that extraterrestrial life visited Earth.
"100 percent," Nolan responded.
"I think it's an advanced form of intelligence that using some kind of intermediaries," Nolan said. "It's not that they walk among us wearing a skin suit. You're going to put something there that I think of as an intelligence test."
He said it’s like the South American native tribes when they first saw the Spanish ships. They didn’t know what they were seeing but it was out of the ordinary.
They didn't know what they were seeing or who or what was coming, Nolan said.
"They're showing up and saying who amongst you are intelligent enough to realize what it is you're looking at … "Can you see what's in front of you for what it really is? Can you see the anomalous data point?"
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The Big Question is why do they want us to believe?
Aliens ‘have been on Earth a long time’: They had to have some place to dump the Marxists and other trash beings.
I’ve read the responses this far and I don’t see anyone reporting personal encounters. I think I had one about 45 years ago, when I was walking along the sidewalk and a woman turned the corner and started reading back my thoughts to me. She was blonde and beautiful, not at all “creature from another feature.”
What you are describing is what is called “Nordics” in the UFO literature.
They are discussed (for example) in three books—this is Volume 1:
https://www.amazon.com/Selected-Extraterrestrials-secret-think-tanks-secretaries/dp/1515217469
The guy’s story of beautiful slutty tall human looking blond women showing up at military industrial complex labs and guiding the research is a “hard swallow” but anyway there it is....
Based on what evidence?
I haven't heard Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, the MSM, the Democrat Party bigwigs, or the government say anything to that effect.
Which oligarchs are you referring to?
The military, intelligence community, and academia are arms of the oligarchs.
Thank you. I was once very close friends with a well-known astronomer and author who said he knew there were UFOs. He was important at the time in NASA so he was not a nut case.
For the Bible believers among us, he pointed out Ezekiel 1, which describes aliens arriving with a technology that we didn’t have at that time.
In later years he lost his prominence, I am guessing because he did not believe the politically correct theory that climate change was caused by human behavior. He said he knew differently. Had three PhDs, so it’s quite credible that he understood more than the rest of us.
Yup—NASA has been “hiding the ball” on this topic for decades.
They are definitely part of the problem and not part of the solution.
Nolan has said he has evidence in his Stanford lab.
What kind of evidence do you have?
That said, when it comes to the CIA, anything is possible (like a distraction). But 99% is, again, indicative of a bias...unless you have evidence.
BTW, Garry Nolan may be a professor at Stanford, but Stanford threatened to withdraw his tenure when he first discussed the issue of UFOs...so you can't say that he speaks for Stanford.
Feed me Seymore!
That's how it often works. Just because a disinformation agent's claim is denied by his employer, doesn't mean he isn't acting at the behest of his employer.
Here's an interesting story from just yesterday: Pentagon to launch 'one-stop shop' UFO website so public can see all declassified photos, videos and reports after Congress demanded answers about 'non human' aircraft.
What is happening is “information management”—creating/controlling a narrative to steer the story in ways that protect the guilty Deep Staters and enrich military industrial complex contractors.
There is plenty there—but they want to keep everybody looking in all the wrong places...
I’m not sure there is a “problem,” though. There may be reasons for not revealing everything that they know.
But because they ditched someone for political reasons, I know enough not to believe everything they say or refuse to say.
BTW, do you know why the Pentagon finally published their website? It was because Congress demanded one.
The government has been dragged kicking and screaming into this matter.
The Pentagon has done nothing but lie to the public for 70+ years.
You may be correct that there is a government conspiracy. But at this point, the evidence doesn't support it.
The scientific method and rational thinking require an unbiased search for the truth before a conclusion is reached.
Here's the problem with reaching a conclusion until all the evidence is in: "confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values."
“There may be reasons for not revealing everything that they know.”
They have their reasons. I just don’t like or agree with the reasons—and I think if you knew what they were you wouldn’t like or agree with them either.
:-)
Let me lay the cards on the table:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t564HRXeS6o
I agree.
We call them liberals.
If she was blonde and beautiful, it probably wasn’t hard for her to know what was on your mind. 😂
Ok, I thought it was dogs.
I’ve been in Japan since 1985 so up until now was totally unaware of “ Dark Skies “ . Sounds right up my street .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.