I was just thinking about the 20 years of wars and the death jab.
I think they have something in common.
Both targeted strong, healthy young men. Yes, plenty of others died, too, but I think one primary target was the young men.
For the jab, it seems to take out young athletes who are pushing themselves hard. I.e., the strongest and fittest. (Is it also reducing fertility in men? I can’t remember. I know it’s causing stillbirths/miscarriages.)
For the wars, we sent our young men (mostly men, mostly young) overseas to fight. We didn’t send enough to get the job done, so they were unnecessarily vulnerable. We didn’t have sufficient armor on the vehicles. We didn’t have sufficient body armor. I can’t seriously believe that we were unable to produce armor. I can’t seriously believe that we couldn’t afford armor. Look at Ukraine - virtually unlimited money. And Trump showed us during the fake-demic that we could easily gear up industry. Remember when companies started making ventilators by the thousands? Much more complex than making armor.
It seems the Deep State has a strong interest in reducing the numbers of able-bodied young men. The part I’m missing is that they don’t seem to be doing a very efficient job of it. Obviously, they can’t just kill all of them off overnight without raising suspicion. But is there some advantage to the DS in killing off as many as they have? Are there studies that show that X% reduction in healthy young men has Y effect on society/culture/economy? Or is it perhaps that they are targeting particular individuals and don’t care about the “collateral damage”? It is my understanding that the DS will crash an entire plane in order to kill one targeted individual.