Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

“Trump is going to have to say he’s against a national abortion ban and if it’s presented to him he’ll veto it.”

Why would he have to say that? I’d just laugh at such a question and say “The Supreme Court has already taken that question out of the hands of Congress and given it back to the states, so any “national abortion ban” would be unconstitutional and not relevant to discuss.”


49 posted on 08/24/2023 9:01:34 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

I thought Burgum did it right. He said unequivocally he would not support a Federal Abortion Ban, although as Governor, he did sign one of the strictest Abortion bans in the country.


52 posted on 08/24/2023 9:03:54 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

That would actually be a good response. And it seems to be literally true. Congress cannot override the Supreme court with a mere law reinstating what they struck down.


69 posted on 08/24/2023 9:18:45 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson