You left out the Bagavad Gita and the Upanishads but cited the “Swami” in rebuttal. The Swami never really repented of his syncretism, reading thru his history. Jesus remained for him as one of the Brahmaic paths to God.
Jesus is the light of the World, in whom the eternal Logos expressed itself radiantly through his humanity, born of a virgin.
The entire Pauline discourse in Acts 17...”to the unknown God” testifies against you here!
You folks are like the Pharasitic Jews eho were persecuting Paul.
Keep in mind, these people were worshiping gold and silver earthly idols, not God. As they couldn’t comprehend God. Just of many here cannot comprehend God.
I challenge each person to write down their own description of God in their own words. Then I challenge them to write it again experientally rather than theoretically.
Just as there are many languages, each describing the same thing, there are many religions describing the same thing. Each of these religions are not describing earthly idols as Acts 17 does, so your comparison is a fallacy in logical argumentation.
If anything, you acting like the Pharisees in Acts 17 is directly comparable.