Your comic-styled picture (rather adolescent and eerily points to YOU as the source of truth) changes nothing from what I posted.
The simple fact remains...
A false premise results in false conclusions.
What’s the over/under until LS (a bright, respected and conservative independent mind on FR for many years) gets wished into the cornfield?
...only a matter of time, I suppose.
Interestingly, even members of groupthink are even now wishing other members into the cornfield. It’s breaking down, as evidenced by the circling of wagons to protect the narrative and the numbers of posts each day shrinking. None dare post double-plus-ungood speak on these threads...ha.
Very entertaining indeed!
Because any free thoughts that deviate from qroupthink are ganged up on by the limited and daily diminishing Q groupthink.
...and here I always thought this was a conservative news and discussion forum.
It is a bit odd that LS was invited to these threads, UNTIL he expressed an independent thought which contradicted the Qroupthink. It is rude. Invite a man into a conversation, but when he expresses ideas different from the approved narrative, denigrate him. This, according to definition, perfectly fits the descriptors of a cult.
...you’ll get over it though.
On the contrary, I am encouraged by all the commotion.
I find it illuminating.
You may not have noticed, but I’m rather against the whole “banishing to the cornfield” thing.
As “the narrative” increasingly requires “better” narrative control, things get even more interesting.
~Easy
Oh, by the way, a Meme isn’t really a Meme until it has been “Stolen”, like I stole
that “Is that supposed to be a bad thing?” Meme.
Truth is Truth, regardless of its source, and I’m just another anon,
anon-ing on like all the others.
at one time, LS asked they we don’t ping him re: “Q”.
Why he chose to engage now escapes me.
What is troubling is: where are the defenders who are not calling him “troll”? 1280+ posts and he hasn’t been called a troll.
sum ting wrong... anyone ? Bueller ? Bueller ?
When someone rejects an idea without ever having studied it (rejecting Q, but never having even read any Q posts!), that person is guilty of intellectual dishonesty, no matter how well-informed on other topics.