Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jewbacca
"a law making the children responsible for the debts of the parents."

How, in all this world, is that even legal.?

I can see where they might go after anything with the parents name on it but, beyond that, (??)

65 posted on 07/31/2023 5:58:41 AM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: unread

“Typically, these laws obligate adult children (or depending on the state, other family members) to pay for their indigent parents’/relatives’ food, clothing, shelter and medical needs. Should the children fail to provide adequately, they allow nursing homes and government agencies to bring legal action to recover the cost of caring for the parents. Adult children can even go to jail in some states if they fail to provide filial support.”

“States and territories with filial responsibility laws
Alaska
Arkansas [nb 1]
California
Connecticut [nb 2]
Delaware
Georgia
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Mississippi
Nevada [nb 3]
New Jersey
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia”

” Arkansas law can only require payment for adult mental care.
Connecticut law only applies if the parents are younger than 65.
Nevada law only mandates filial liability only if there is a written agreement to pay for care.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filial_responsibility_laws


68 posted on 07/31/2023 6:04:09 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (“Miserably inadequate” people generally vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: unread

It’s called filial responsibility laws.

About half the USA states impose this.

I’ll send the link later.

But, yes, it’s a thing. In the particular circumstance I know about, the adult child (who was 60 something) was sexually abused by the father and they had zero contact for decades.

And yet NJ wanted the cash.


93 posted on 07/31/2023 7:28:04 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson