In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled VLAD'S ZOMBIE ARMY Putin’s ‘out-of-control zombie troops’ return from Ukraine with ‘warped thirst for violence’ after being forced to fight, ought-six wrote: Not surprisingly, you are evading my comment!
I specifically mentioned the claim your source made that the US is drugging Ukrainian soldiers and turning them into inhuman monsters to rape, torture and kill women, children and POWs. It’s right there in the thread YOU started, and is in the article YOU cited.
Don’t try to weasel out of that by trotting out a claim of bio labs, when what we are questioning is the claim that the US has bio-WEAPONS labs in Ukraine, which YOU guys bring up on a regular basis.
You trotted out a source, so here is one in rebuttal:
So, show your proof that the US has bio-WEAPONS labs in Ukraine! And some hysterical Russian blogger waxing indignant is not proof. Nor are the attachments in your post: They mention BIO labs; they do not mention bio-WEAPONS labs.
But, you now that.
I specifically mentioned the claim your source made thatOh it's always distortion with you. Why should I waste my time? In your original post below, you said I cited 'some Russan blogger' and in my response I proved I was citing the Russian government's website. In my thread, which you read, I state that I wanted to know what Russia's petition to the UN said. I think that the MSM and UN blackout on the contents of the Russian petition are noteworthy and so I posted it in the following thread:Irina Yarovaya presented the outcome report of the Parliamentary Commission on Investigation into Activities of the US Biological Laboratories in Ukraine PLUS MY COMMENTS
Here's your prior post falsely claiming the source of the assertions re drugs/soldiers was 'some blogger.'
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled VLAD'S ZOMBIE ARMY Putin’s ‘out-of-control zombie troops’ return from Ukraine with ‘warped thirst for violence’ after being forced to fight, ought-six wrote: Hey, ransomnote here on FR just recently started a thread wherein he cited some Russian blogger saying that the US is drugging Ukrainian troops to turn them into inhuman monsters who rape and torture and kill women and children and POWs. Maybe he got the story wrong, and it was actually about Russia, and not about the US.
I’m including him in this reply, in order to give him a chance to clear it up.
Then I 'cleared it up' for you by telling you are a troll distorting the truth.
Normal people will decide what they believe about the current conduct of the war, the UN and MSM blackout on Russia's petition, and the contents of Russia's petition as described.
Russia documented their assertions and asked the UN to investigate. The MSM and UN declined to investigate, citing 'baseless assertions' 'without evidence' in a fashion eerily similar to the way the MSM and our gov officials closed ranks and parroted 'baseless assertions' and 'no evidence' regarding the theft of the 2020 elections.
I posted as I have because I am investigating the assertions made in a Twitter post here: prior thread about Biden's Metabiota, and assertions Metabiota is among 50 bio warfare labs operating in the Ukraine.
The MSM won't cover anything like that so We the People have to go looking ourselves. I think the MSM/UN blackout on Russia's petition, and the Russian's willingness to have the issue exposed to the public via a UN investigation, provides some evidence the assertions about US biowarfare labs operating in the Ukraine are likely true.
The reason the Deep State's headquarters is located in the Ukraine is that bio labs, experiments on people, money laudering, blackmail etc. can be concealed, unless of course outsiders are allowed to investigate.
You're trying to lead all this off into the woods and demand I prove elements of Russia's petition. What I did was prove such a Russian petition exists, that it was submitted to the UN, and what the Russian petition asserts. I'm glad to break a media blackout whenever I can.
You trotted out some counter article supposedly 'fact-checking' Russia's assertions, not mine. Naturally, you used a Deep State 'fact checker' of no worth. Your source is Samantha Putterman, PolitiFact.com, which is smear content and at the moment, is proudly 'fact-checking' Biden and Harris as 'true' while smearing all aspects of President Trump.
And yet you posture as if you have the moral high ground when in fact you're in a crater and still digging.
“Oh it’s always distortion with you.”
Nice try, kid. Pointing out facts is not distortion.
“Why should I waste my time?”
The typical position taken by someone who has lost an argument.
“In your original post below, you said I cited ‘some Russan blogger’ and in my response I proved I was citing the Russian government’s website.”
Your source was Irina Yarovaya, a member of the Russian Duma who has reported both in person and online sensationalist claims about US bio-WEAPONS labs in Ukraine that create drugged up “super soldiers” that rape and torture and kill women, and children, and POWS. Has she had articles published by Russian state organs? Absolutely. Which speaks ill of the Russian government (I mean, her sensationalism could be excused by Russia as the rantings of some unhinged nut on the internet; but, the fact it PUBLISHED her sensationalism is more a reflection on the Russian government than it is, perhaps, on her).
Here’s an article that addresses her sensationalist claims:
“Then I ‘cleared it up’ for you by telling you are a troll distorting the truth.”
Too funny! You didn’t clear up squat: You evaded the issue entirely; in fact, in one of your posts you DENIED that her comment about the drugged up “monsters” was even in her article! Even after I pointed it out to you directly! That’s not only evasion; that is running away in panic.
“You’re trying to lead all this off into the woods and demand I prove elements of Russia’s petition.”
I’m asking you to present proof of the claim, which you clearly believe; or else you would not have taken the adversarial position against the US that you have.
“What I did was prove such a Russian petition exists, that it was submitted to the UN, and what the Russian pet...”
Which is nothing, because it is widely known to exist because it’s been in the works for many months, and has been reported on. That’s like saying you “proved” Pravda is a Russian newspaper by holding up a copy of...(gasp!) the front page of Pravda.
“You trotted out some counter article supposedly ‘fact-checking’ Russia’s assertions, not mine. Naturally, you used a Deep State ‘fact checker’ of no worth.”
One of many sources; it was just the first one to pop up. I cited it to show you that there is another side to your claim. If you were a true “investigator” you’d have acknowledged the rebuttals of the claim and let the reader come to his or her own conclusion. But, of course, you are not an “investigator” seeking the truth; you are a hack propagandist for Russia.
“And yet you posture as if you have the moral high ground when in fact you’re in a crater and still digging.”
Nice try, kid.