Pentagon UFO Chief Rips Whistleblower Testimony

Newsmax ^ | 07/28/2023 | Sean Kirkpatrick

[GingisK]

Sean Kirkpatrick, who leads the Pentagon's UFO office, ripped whistleblower testimony from a Wednesday congressional hearing that claimed to have firsthand knowledge of "nonhuman" technology, calling the proceeding "insulting" in a post on LinkedIn.

[NotWokeOrCommie]

Actually, online, when I discuss the idea, across forums, about aliens, I ask the same thing.

Prove the amazing evidence for such an amazing thing.

That’s it. Period. It just does not happen.

[NotWokeOrCommie]

The best ‘evidence’ I’ve seen is recovered titanium alloy spherical objects that are difficult to naturally explain.

You know what else is difficult to naturally explain? Less than 50 yeas ago?

[GingisK]

It is true that the routine UFO sightings do not offer proof of anything. There are, however, deathbed witnesses to crash/retrieval operations. There are analysis briefs that were leaked and then later debunked by government people. Analysis of those leaked documents actually gives a high probability of authenticity. There are crystal clear photographs of UFOs that have been analyzed by the Kodak Image Lab and another independent team and declared authentic. There are thousands of first hand reports that are simply ignored. In no other human endeavor have so many first hand reports been dismissed.

Which of those mentioned above have you seen and carefully read? (I am not asking for specifics, just whether or not you know of them and have observed them end-to-end with an open mind.)

[GingisK]

Fast Movers are now being observed by people because of the high performance cameras not in ordinary hands. These are moving very fast without a sonic boom. I have seen many of these, just look around for them.

[NotWokeOrCommie]

I have to admit, you got me. I did not read debunked claims. I have seen hundreds of debunked pictures though, all fake or explained by man made or natural things.

If you’re going to present something as an argument it’s problematic to say it’s debunked in your initial few sentences. That pretty much means, ‘disregard everything I say, I’m a clown’.

[NotWokeOrCommie]

Fast movers are bugs or dust caught in high frame cameras. you’re grasping.

[GingisK]

Your post is an exact recap of the facts. Really good evidence is always firmly denied. Few people actually understand cameras.

[NotWokeOrCommie]

Do you believe in spirit orbs they *used* to show on ghost hunting shows too? Dust/bugs.

[GingisK]

No, that means that the documents were first leaked to the public, then government people debunked them as a form of damage control, then qualified people showed that, in spite of government efforts, the documents are probably authentic.

[Jane Long]

IBTZ.

[GingisK]

Lens flares?

[Jane Long]

You’re begging for the ZOT.

How cool.

🙃

[NotWokeOrCommie]

If the worst thing I had today was getting a zot, that’s been a pretty good day.

[GingisK]

Prove the amazing evidence for such an amazing thing.

How many posters on these forums do you think actually possess the proof? The actual proof is secreted away. I use the "preponderance of the evidence" method to form my opinions. I also have faith in the aggregate of testimony given by many witnesses.

For example, have you actually seen an electron? You merely believe the empirical evidence that they exist. Have you seen Pluto? One again, you believe astronomers wouldn't lie or concoct their fuzzy photographs. It always comes down to the faith you have in the people who bring information to you. It NEVER depends on artifacts. Artifacts can always be faked.

[wgmalabama]

Zotted. Good deal. Guarantee he will retread.

[Tilapiafish2]

Zotted. But you’re saying that pluto exists that aliens do?

[GingisK]

If you’re going to present something as an argument it’s problematic to say it’s debunked in your initial few sentences.

It is obvious that you didn't read those initial sentences with much care. You have demonstrated that you aren't here to learn anything or discuss this. You are here to preach, debunk, and ridicule. That was my initial understanding of your posts, which aught to explain why I don't want to consume any of my time providing you with the material it has taken me many years to gather. You'd merely scoff at that material and waste my efforts.

[GingisK]

No. I’m saying that the evidence for Pluto comes on faith in those who say it does, just like the evidence for UFOs comes on faith. It never comes down to hard evidence. It always comes down to faith in the messenger.

[Tilapiafish2]

I would think that critical thinking and research would be more valuable than faith when it it comes to aliens, but I guess that’s up to YHWH