[NotWokeOrCommie]

I have to admit, you got me. I did not read debunked claims. I have seen hundreds of debunked pictures though, all fake or explained by man made or natural things.

If you’re going to present something as an argument it’s problematic to say it’s debunked in your initial few sentences. That pretty much means, ‘disregard everything I say, I’m a clown’.

[GingisK]

No, that means that the documents were first leaked to the public, then government people debunked them as a form of damage control, then qualified people showed that, in spite of government efforts, the documents are probably authentic.

[GingisK]

If you’re going to present something as an argument it’s problematic to say it’s debunked in your initial few sentences.

It is obvious that you didn't read those initial sentences with much care. You have demonstrated that you aren't here to learn anything or discuss this. You are here to preach, debunk, and ridicule. That was my initial understanding of your posts, which aught to explain why I don't want to consume any of my time providing you with the material it has taken me many years to gather. You'd merely scoff at that material and waste my efforts.