“You negate any claim made outside the mainstream media as unworthy of consideration.”
No; I don’t. But it’s telling that you assume facts not in evidence and jump to conclusions and rush to judgment, which is so typical of someone who can’t prevail on the facts.
If your Twitter sources are so credible where are the peer reviews of their theses? In what authoritative journals or records have these theses been published?
If you are going to condemn the US you better have one hell of a lot more evidence than someone’s Twitter comment.
“NATO and the US aren’t going to admit to it, as NATO won’t either. This is the information blackout you support.”
My God, but you are naiive. If we had bio weapons labs do you honestly think we’d admit it? Such programs would be HIGHLY classified. And, again you show you have no coherent argument, by jumping to the conclusion that by my asking to see evidence I am somehow supporting an information blackout.
“You try to smear a FReeper for having an opinion...”
That’s a lie, and you know it. Opinions are fine; but they should be supported by some credible foundation, and presented sans emotion and hyperbole (because if one has to resort to emotion and hyperbole it generally means one doesn’t have much confidence in his or her own opinion). And I will push back on that.
“You sure are eager to brand people ‘guilty’ of having an opinion you don’t like.”
Again, that’s a lie and you know it.
You are trying to distract from the content of this thread. Russia says biowarfare labs are there, the UN/NATO/US/CNN/NPR Et al. say that the assertions are ‘baseless’ and ‘have no evidence’ and then as a FReeper just posted, there is evidence of US funded research labs dealing with dangerous pathogens. You didn’t expect the US to ADMIT they were conducting bio warfare right? Because those labs are secure facilities admitting only Ukrainian and US officials. The TWitter source has successfully pointed to these labs and I am investigating to see what else there is about them.
‘Peer reviewed’ when the UN won’t even investigate? Who would gain access to get the documentation and who peer reviews requests to the UN? You’re just making it up as you go along, and wasting our time.
Vicki, that you?