You are trying to distract from the content of this thread. Russia says biowarfare labs are there, the UN/NATO/US/CNN/NPR Et al. say that the assertions are ‘baseless’ and ‘have no evidence’ and then as a FReeper just posted, there is evidence of US funded research labs dealing with dangerous pathogens. You didn’t expect the US to ADMIT they were conducting bio warfare right? Because those labs are secure facilities admitting only Ukrainian and US officials. The TWitter source has successfully pointed to these labs and I am investigating to see what else there is about them.
‘Peer reviewed’ when the UN won’t even investigate? Who would gain access to get the documentation and who peer reviews requests to the UN? You’re just making it up as you go along, and wasting our time.
“You are trying to distract from the content of this
thread.”
Au contraire. I am jumping into the very heart of the thread: The self-serving claim in some Russian vanity blog that the US is operating a biological weapons program in Ukraine. And, what’s more, that the US has injected Ukrainian troops with “...psychotropic drugs, which are aimed at increasing both their aggressiveness and inhuman cruelty...which is directed against...women, children and prisoners of war.” She goes on to say that the US is injecting these troops in order to create unhuman “monsters.”
She goes from claiming the US is operating bio-weapons labs in Ukraine to claiming the US is intentionally injecting Ukrainian troops with drugs that will make them rape and torture and kill women, children, and POWs! What; did she forget the slander of the US ordering the bayonetting of little babies? Of putting newborns in ovens?
Her screed is typical of Russian propaganda. And you seem to lend it credence.
“’Peer reviewed’ when the UN won’t even investigate?”
So, are you saying that there cannot be any peer reviews if the UN is not investigating? Because that is what your statement is implying.
“The TWitter source has successfully pointed to these labs...”
No, she has not; she has just made a claim, and one that she has not substantiated with any credible evidence (and her hyperbole about manmade monsters ruining the virtues of unidentified women, and abusing children, and torturing and killing not only the lot of them, but POWS, as well.
“...and I am investigating to see what else there is about them.”
Good; you do that. Let us know what actual evidence you come up with. You may even get a Pulitzer.
“’Peer reviewed’ when the UN won’t even investigate?”
So, are you saying that there cannot be any peer reviews if the UN is not investigating? Because that is what your statement is implying.
“Who would gain access to get the documentation and who peer reviews requests to the UN?”
Well, Russia is making the claim, so it should be up to Russia to get the documentation to support its claim. And I don’t think you quite understand what a peer review is:
It is a review of an expert’s work or scholarship by his or her peers (i.e., other experts in the same field or discipline).
“You’re just making it up as you go along...”
No, I’m pushing back on wild claims and hysterical hyperbole.
“...and wasting our time.”
Which means you can’t support your position, and are taking to the hills. That is not surprising, given that your argument all along has been somewhat shy of coherent.
He seems to FEAR a UN investigation. One has to wonder why? I mean, if he’s right and our work in those labs are as pure as the wind-driven snow, then Russia would look like IDIOTS...seems to me that would make him even happier.