Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

ThankQ MQD and all my FreeQ family for bringing so much information to the Q thread.


105 posted on 07/18/2023 6:32:54 PM PDT by ssschev (Pick up the can, hang the trash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ssschev

+++


107 posted on 07/18/2023 6:50:41 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

rn: We were talking about 'Covid' deaths last thread. There's a NYT article titled as follows:

US Covid-19 deaths overcounted by nearly a third – New York Times

But that's incorrect based on the information in the article. 30% of deaths classified as resulting from "Covid" were, upon review, deemed to be deaths from other primary illnesses. The paper says that's 'nearly a third' so I'll use the NYT terminology elsewhere.

So let's say two thirds of the deaths are now said to be the result of a primary respiratory illness. End Result According to the records review: One third of supposed "Covid" deaths were from non-primary 'Covid' and two thirds were supposedly from, primarily, 'Covid.' (But the 'Covid' test was invalid so....)

One third is 50% of two thirds.

The NYT article title should have read "US Covid-19 deaths overcounted by nearly 50%".

Running the numbers for a more precise percentage, using the NYT stated data of 30% misclassification of "Covid" deaths means that Covid-19 deaths were overcounted by 43%.

That overcount number is no doubt still far too low, and the test is invalid, but we can see a little more of 'What caused people to be counted as dying from "Covid' during the plandemic.


115 posted on 07/18/2023 7:54:45 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson