Replies

Yes, that’s them, the Fuscos in NJ.

Question:

Did drs test for flu and covid when the covid tests became available?

If so, what were the results?

If both flu and covid were positive, would it mean covid was a new flu?

If only covid was positive, would it mean it wasn’t a new flu?

If only flu was positive, would it mean it was a new flu?

Okay, here’s this from a different paper:

https://www.nj.com/coronavirus/2020/03/nj-family-ravaged-by-coronavirus-loses-fourth-member.html

(Note: This happened in March 2020.)

“A fourth person from the same New Jersey family has died after being infected with the coronavirus, the family’s attorney told NJ Advance Media on Thursday.

Vincent Fusco died Thursday at CentraState Medical Center in Freehold, said Roseann Paradiso Fodera, a cousin and the lawyer representing the Fusco family.

The death comes just a day after Vincent Fusco’s mother died at the same facility. His brother, Carmine Fusco, died Wednesday morning at St. Luke’s University Hospital-Bethlehem Campus, in Fountain Hill, Pennsylvania.

And his sister, Rita Fusco-Jackson, died last Friday and later tested positive for COVID-19, becoming the state’s second victim.

Vincent Fusco was one of six members of the Freehold-based family hospitalized for coronavirus after they attended a family gathering.”

So, two die at the same hospital (protocols?). Another dies at a hospital in another state. I think the fourth died at home.

The best I can determine the timeline:

On a Friday in March 2020 the sister, middle-aged woman, dies at home.

The following Wednesday, the one brother to the sister dies at a hospital in PA and a few hours later the same day their mother dies in a central NJ hospital. The next day, the third sibling dies in the same NJ hospital.

The family photo shows some heavy people but it is not labeled as to which ones are the ones that passed away.

So, sister passes away from Covid or something while others in the family are feeling sick from something. This sort of stress would make people vulnerable to the something being more risky than a less stressful time to have something.

Weren’t the ventilators starting then as sort of the first line of defense against Covid?

Was a contributing factor that three of them were scared to death after hearing of the first death?

I think back to when my father passed away and my aunt got Covid and I went downhill due to that and the profound lack of ability to sleep it caused. It really required a lot of prayers, willpower, faith in and hope in the Ivermectin and all sorts of other things (supplements, Amoxicillin I stole from my fish) to keep it together.

Suppose one did not have Ivermectin to take and put faith in and wasn’t hitting the antibiotics to be on the safe side?

You ask reasonable questions. Here’s what we knew at the time:

1. For almost a full year, nobody could get their hands on the exact genetic sequence of the SARS-COV-2 virus. MIT finally mapped it out as completely as they could in April of 2021, but still admitted that the full sequence eluded them.
2. The labs performing covid tests were using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process, invented by Dr. Kary Mullis in 1983. In recognition of his role in the invention of the PCR technique, Mullis shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year.
3. Prior to his death in 2019, Dr. Mullis reiterated at every opportunity that the PCR process should never be used as a diagnostic tool because it could be manipulated to find anything you wanted to find simply by increasing the number of times the sample was amplified.
4. Reputable labs suggested no more than 26-28 amplifications for covid tests.
5. Government health officials were requiring labs to amplify their samples more than 40 times.

Given the widespread and inappropriate use and abuse of the PCR process to “identify” covid, a virus that had not been fully sequenced even a year later, who knows what they were finding?

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/10/2023 Vol.465, Q Day 2073, WildHighlander57 wrote:

Yes, that’s them, the Fuscos in NJ.

Question:

Did drs test for flu and covid when the covid tests became available?

If so, what were the results?

If both flu and covid were positive, would it mean covid was a new flu?

If only covid was positive, would it mean it wasn’t a new flu?

If only flu was positive, would it mean it was a new flu?

I read doctors interviewed in hospitals who said they tested for Covid only. This of course is part of the psyop - not blaming the doctors but the PCR test was based on the influenza virus because both are corona virus. So they were administering a test to identify an influenza corona virus and if the fake test was positive (the PCR has a huge false positive rate) , you were diagnosed with Covid, a different coronavirus??? So an influenza test would be redundant to the PCR.

Some doctors said that they felt they were 'missing' the point when what was called Covid became pneumonia. These patients were not treated at all for severe influenza because they were falsely portrayed as having 'Covid'. Once you're diagnosed with Covid, all treatment ceases because the CDC says there's NO treatment available. Gosh it turns out if you don't treat sick people, or give them a toxic CDC protocol of Remdesivir and Intubation instead - they die.

The CDC certainly tried to hide all the ways the PCR was fake and innappropriate for the 'pandemic' they said would wipe us all out.

They 'repurposed' the annual flu, withdrew all treatment for it, inserted toxic protocols and voila! Pandemic.

Remember when Dr. Brix said, "Well, we don't have influenza anymore...."

This is why Nancy Pelosi was running around San Francisco after she closed businesses down, to get her hair styled. She knew the 'pandemic' virus wasn't more than the annual flu. There were likely other, more serious illnesses falsely diagnosed as Covid, and then there have been suggestions (Dr. Mikovits) that the Covid 'vaccine' was surreptitiously put in two ordinary vaccines in 2019 so people would experience symptoms of vaccine harm BEFORE the vaccine was released. Therefore - we had trolls sneering that x or y syndrome or medical crisis could NOT be caused by the Covid 'vaccine' because people were having it in 2019 'with Covid'.

And who knows, maybe our enemies released more serious influenzas that year that hit patients denied treatment particularly hard?