Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/30/2023 Vol.464, Q Day 2063, smileyface wrote:
The ‘system’ has players on the ‘light side’ and on the ‘dark side’. I would not be surprised if people, movies, conferences, etc that have a good shiny appearance have something/someone underneath or behind it with a hidden purpose.
For example, be careful if this movie is the impetus to chip and track all children with the guise of ‘for their safety’ but in actuality the intent is much more sinister.
It should be ok for a post of Ballard’s possibly fishy tie design, and then allow for others to dig and add information. It is not ok to vilify the poster and pile on with talking points and attaboys.
At some point early on, Pence was on the WH list. Long-time, diligent posters —including me— were ridiculed and degraded for putting forth evidence and concerns to the contrary. Same is true with Bill Barr, Sessions, and Flynn. Even to consider data to the contrary of their WH status or good intentions was/is blasphemy.
The overt reaction to data that diverges from the thread narrative makes people think that something may be guiding posts here on the thread, other than digging and discussion.
I don't share your beliefs in the 'light side' and 'dark side' as you previously described it, but I do think there are wolves in sheeps' clothing and evil posing as good.
If the Deep State seizes on the movie as a reason to microchip kids, a program it already encourages, it doesn't mean Ballard has anything to do with it. Yes we need to be vigilant and dig, and those who dug found the image is false and actually contains praying hands, but the original reckless assertions about Ballard's work looks like torpedoing a life boat for children.
We on the Q thread have learned by trial and error to slow down and vette information and in this instance, one un-vetted pic of a tie, that no one bothered to look up on the 'net before posting it as real, was treated as valid. Those who posted doubt about the assertions/meaning of the pic were falsely identified as the reason the Q threads failed, ended etc. and all of us were attacked for being failures and told to pack up our tents etc.
Yet you're against vilifying the poster? How about vilifying all who post on the Q threads and the thread itself? That's fine in your book?
Lately pile-on has been used to falsely describe informal consensus and comment - that's not the same thing as 'pile on' in the derogatory sense.
I don't agree with those being ridiculed/degraded for putting forth evidence. If/when that happens, it's wrong. But it's often the case that the poster supporting a position doesn't or can't defend the critique against that position. That's not being degraded - it's the natural result when any two or more persons debate, some have the time, patience, resources and/or capacity to articulate their position better than others supporting an unpopular view. I avoid using the word blasphemy in such cases and try to reserve it for spiritual realms.
I've seen your prior post suggesting I asked you not to post your spiritual resource on the main thread because I want to suppress the truth from getting out. If I wanted to suppress the truth I would help Cletus shut down the thread. Instead, I believe God can still use us here.
Prayers up! May God use our skills and lead us in this fight.