The navy ocean surveillance systems are designed to detect, identify, and track submarines. They do this by integration over time of the acoustics to see beats and harmonics (like a 30 Hz propeller screw). Onetime events, like whale farts or hull implosions require an analyst to know roughly when the event occurred and be looking for it, since there is no further integration of that one time event by definition.
The autonomous detection by these systems has a library of known threats and the frequency signatures of those threats. While this mini sub had electric propellers before its demise, electrics are especially hard to hear, and they were not likely in the signals of interest the navy systems would be looking for.
So, after the fact, someone could come to the navy and say ‘could you look for something peculiar at this time’. But only by going back through the recordings could you possibly find something.
Thanks!
Yes. The navy looked into it and passed on the info to the coast guard the same day. There was just no point in revealing that to the public. And of course they knew it was almost certainly an implosion. Not really a need to confirm. But gotta act like there was some question about that. All part of the game.
The implosion would have lit off alarms, which is a known signature all the way back from the Thresher. They knew something imploded, they knew the approximate area it occurred in.
The moment Oceangate reported publically the sub was missing the US Navy quickly put 2 and 2 together and knew that was what exploded.
Biden used it top cover his criminal son’s news activity by allowing this horrible drama to play out at the cost of taxpayer dollars.