Replies

My sister sent me the official Trump White House Archive video that I shared
this morning of our President’s Inaugural Address, after I shared the one that
is at the top of the thread with her.

It offers a wider view of the event and what the troops and officers did.
I had hoped it would be placed with the other link in future threads because of
the additional context it provides.

I’ve just been informed by MQD that the ping was most unwelcome, should have
been addressed to “All” (it was.) and not her. (Oops.)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4162610/posts?page=159#159

...and she doesn’t look forward to seeing my ID in her pings.

My previous desperate pleas that she debate others with her former skill, where
ideas were debated gracefully, skillfully avoiding declaration of evil motives on
the part of the opponent being debated, have all been taken as insults.

My apologies to All, but given that stark reality, I probably shouldn’t even be
posting in her threads. It’s not bringing grace, or debate.

Instead, I shall try to follow Bagster’s long ago, and most excellent example,
and try to keep my efforts to help, out beyond the trees except when called.

For the record, and the record does show, I debated HG almost endlessly in
defense of the praying, digging, meme-ing, sharing, mutual support and
discussion that it’s all about. Sometimes with Bagster’s backup and applause.
#Wingmen

I hoped to provide a counter argument to HG’s and certain others position on
all things and people they deemed “QTard.”

In spite of what MQD believes, I don’t want these threads ended or disrupted,
never did. (Knock down, drag out debate on the other hand, Yeah, I confess to
having been up for that... MQD knows I was once in the debating business just
like she was.)

I did want to see HG’s nasty abuse properly moderated, but convinced that he
never would be, I guess, he must have finally gone farther than Jim could ignore.

I still retain hope that Jim will one day see his way to lifting the prohibition on Q
content beyond the trees in light of how it all just keeps coming true, not that
the rule is obeyed perfectly... but still...

PS. I’ve little interest in JOS or ANY of the various other such personalities.
Some of of the ideas SOME of them bandy about are interesting, but the
personalities take my attention away from the ideas and evidence and actors
on all sides that need it. We should have less people wars with hate and more
idea wars with debate. ...And Political Grace.

I follow what Trump, Q, Anons and rest of of you have to say.

Oh, and this guy...
The Future of War and how it affects YOU Multi-Domain Operations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOTYgcdNrXE
(His comments at the end, most especially.)

FRegards,
~Easy

#WWG1WGA
#MAGA again and again.
#WhatQsaid

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/21/2023 Vol.463, Q Day 2063 , EasySt wrote:
My sister sent me the official Trump White House Archive video that I shared
this morning of our President’s Inaugural Address, after I shared the one that
is at the top of the thread with her.
It offers a wider view of the event and what the troops and officers did.
I had hoped it would be placed with the other link in future threads because of
the additional context it provides.
I’ve just been informed by MQD that the ping was most unwelcome, should have
been addressed to “All” (it was.) and not her. (Oops.)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4162610/posts?page=159#159
...and she doesn’t look forward to seeing my ID in her pings.
My previous desperate pleas that she debate others with her former skill, where
ideas were debated gracefully, skillfully avoiding declaration of evil motives on
the part of the opponent being debated, have all been taken as insults.
My apologies to All, but given that stark reality, I probably shouldn’t even be
posting in her threads. It’s not bringing grace, or debate.
Instead, I shall try to follow Bagster’s long ago, and most excellent example,
and try to keep my efforts to help, out beyond the trees except when called.
For the record, and the record does show, I debated HG almost endlessly in
defense of the praying, digging, meme-ing, sharing, mutual support and
discussion that it’s all about. Sometimes with Bagster’s backup and applause.
#Wingmen
I hoped to provide a counter argument to HG’s and certain others position on
all things and people they deemed “QTard.”
In spite of what MQD believes, I don’t want these threads ended or disrupted,
never did. (Knock down, drag out debate on the other hand, Yeah, I confess to
having been up for that... MQD knows I was once in the debating business just
like she was.)
I did want to see HG’s nasty abuse properly moderated, but convinced that he
never would be, I guess, he must have finally gone farther than Jim could ignore.
I still retain hope that Jim will one day see his way to lifting the prohibition on Q
content beyond the trees in light of how it all just keeps coming true, not that
the rule is obeyed perfectly... but still...
PS. I’ve little interest in JOS or ANY of the various other such personalities.
Some of of the ideas SOME of them bandy about are interesting, but the
personalities take my attention away from the ideas and evidence and actors
on all sides that need it. We should have less people wars with hate and more
idea wars with debate. ...And Political Grace.
I follow what Trump, Q, Anons and rest of of you have to say.
Oh, and this guy...
The Future of War and how it affects YOU Multi-Domain Operations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOTYgcdNrXE
(His comments at the end, most especially.)
FRegards,
~Easy
#WWG1WGA
#MAGA again and again.
#WhatQsaid
My first email to you.
Re: Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/21/2023 Vol.463, Q Day 2063
To EasySt | 06/22/2023 10:41:51 AM PDT sent
ThankQ for the WHite House link. Please post it to ‘all’ instead of to me as I will see it in the forum, and it will help me keep up with my comments when I log on. ThankQ.
You responded that you were bewildered, asked if you were not allowed to help me, asked if I wanted you to have the mods remove your post, and told me my' hate was eroding my grace.'
I ask myself, "What hate?"
Since your previous emails typically include that kind of needless insult, I wrote the following. Oh and and after I clicked 'send' I wondered if I should have specified I was referring to your email insults (series of 3 emails, remember?)- if that would have made a difference, but I doubt it.
Re: Re: Re: Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/21/2023 Vol.463, Q Day 2063
To EasySt | 06/22/2023 11:42:45 AM PDT sent
You’ve insulted me so many times that I don’t look forward to posts from you to me specifically. If you post to the forum, I will see it. When I log on to my account and look at my comments, I have so many to look at it really takes my time to go through, and so reducing some of the courtesy pings from people who insult me routinely, is a two-fer. ThankQ.
And so you responded with valorous victim thread drama. I suppose you may join the others said to have been driven from the thread by my spontaneous, unreasonable behavior. (examples found in my reply here.)