But you didn’t present objective evidence, you presented something you got from another source that you’ve decided, somewhat arbitrarily, to trust.
Dude. Your original question asked why experts in this field were reluctant to adopt your wackadoodle theory. The simple answer I gave you was the evidence preponderates against it. I haven’t endorsed or adopted anything, only stated a fact about a consensus against your wackadoodleism. So no, I will not bite by defending the consensus. There is plenty out there if you care to educate yourself. If you want to attack the current thinking with fact, that would be interesting. Or you can remain a wackadoodle by continuing to say you have some secret knowledge.