Dude. Your original question asked why experts in this field were reluctant to adopt your wackadoodle theory. The simple answer I gave you was the evidence preponderates against it. I haven’t endorsed or adopted anything, only stated a fact about a consensus against your wackadoodleism. So no, I will not bite by defending the consensus. There is plenty out there if you care to educate yourself. If you want to attack the current thinking with fact, that would be interesting. Or you can remain a wackadoodle by continuing to say you have some secret knowledge.
The word “wackadoodle” is not a legitimate argument.
But it does strongly suggest you have very little confidence in your position.