"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion"
"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records"
Jackson also concluded that a decision to challenge a president's decision lies solely with the National Archives and can't be reviewed by a court. If the Archives wants to challenge a decision, that agency and the attorney general can initiate an enforcement mechanism under the law, but it is a civil procedure and has no criminal penalty, she noted.
No intent. No concealing.
Everything Trump did, contradicts their frame up.
From the beginning the boxes could be easily seen-known leaving the White House. And then to Fla. No where else.
No willful intention to hide anything.
Boxes have to go somewhere. From the pics don’t see anything hidden.
Nothing hidden in the walls.
Why would someone talk about something at a resort they were trying to hide?
Somebody mentioned that earlier on Friday; thanks for posting the details, here.
BINGO AND BUMPING❣
And extra Special attention to last line of, “...challenges are...civil procedure and has no criminal penalty”
*****************************
From Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration (the Bill Clinton audio tape case ) Judge Jackson wrote :
“Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President’s term and in his sole discretion”
“Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records”
Jackson also concluded that a decision to challenge a president’s decision lies solely with the National Archives and can’t be reviewed by a court. If the Archives wants to challenge a decision, that agency and the attorney general can initiate an enforcement mechanism under the law, but it is a civil procedure and has no criminal penalty, she noted.