Enjoy.
What is the author’s audience vs Tuckers?
This is like a flea biting an elephant.
Didn’t Carlson get close to 100 million views? These journalists writing lies about how Carlson is speaking to a “smaller audience” should be heckled mercilessly for their dishonesty.
A really desperate attempt at a smear…
Make the author and variety look very weak.
Critics ought to think about the 100+ million views and why so many people agree with most or all of what Tucker says.
Tucker’s first episode has over 100 million viewers. That’s 100+ million that have never heard of Stephen Rodrick. This clown’s article just feels up wasted space.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419?cxt=HHwWhoC8nebMxZ8uAAAA
102.2MM views, as of about 20 minutes ago.
Last I checked the Tucker tweet had 101 million views.
This dweeb, Stephan Rodrick, from Variety has 6746 followers.
EC
From Wikipedia (a source that should be friendly to Variety!): Paid Distribution: 54,000
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Tucker got tens of millions of views on his video.
LOL! This is funny.
Poor Tucker got 75,000,000 views and who is this shlep named roderick?
I did not watch Tucker as I don't twat or twit, but I may have to change my position.
And no one ever heard of Stephen Rodrick until now when he baselessly attacks Tucker, thereby getting a tiny splinter of attention.
Look how much attention his show is getting from the liberal media😂
are stephen rodrick and taylor lorenz a thing?
That was quite the little tantrum there, Mr. Rodrick. Feel better now?
Smaller result? Whatre they looking for? 100 million views he got
Well, how dripping with sarcasm.
In the first place, Brits will tell you it has 27 letters, with the last one being &.
In the second place, Dems and some Ukrainian military will tell you it has 25 letters, since their alphabet is not-Z.
Carlson must be destroyed for his wrong think about Ukraine. Must not go against the Soros/globalist narrative.
Stephen Rodrick has made a career out of slanderous attacks on Republicans. So he’s even more hyper-partisan that that tiresome hack David Brock.
Here’s some details about his pathetic career:
He was formerly a deputy press secretary for Illinois Senator Alan J. Dixon of Illinois from 1981 until 1993.
In 1996 he burst on the stage as a feature writer with a nasty attack profile of Republican political consultant Arthur Finkelstein for Boston Magazine.
That dubious distinction landed him stints with New York magazine where he did vicious attack profiles of Senator Fred Thompson and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Perhaps the only admirable thing he did was to write an account of his father’s life in his first book, The Magical Stranger, published in 2013.
His biography of his Dad, Commander Peter Rodrick, includes details about his two years in the VAQ-135 squadron. His father was killed in a crash in 1979.
Rodrick showed he was also good in writing the equivalent of “blow jobs in print” for celebrities favored by the Left, including his flattering portraits of Robert Redford and Johny Depp.
Despite all this — hardly anyone ever heard of him.
Basically as a writer Stephen Rodrick is either at your throat or at your feet.
There is no nuance or balance — and this is why he is still a hack and will always be a hack.
I stopped reading at “Variety”.