Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/05/2023 Vol.461, Q Day 2047

qalerts.app ^ | 6/5/2023 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity

[foldspace]

---

[eldoradude]

Thank you #1!

[Keflavik76]

Woke Marvel Eliminates The Punisher Due To "Problematic" Conservative Fan Base | ZeroHedge

[foldspace]

---

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

But we are.

[gathersnomoss]

Excellent point

[Melian]

[Melian]

[Melian]

Strike 3, tucking fat man.

[Melian]

[Melian]

This month Marvel officially declared the Punisher persona non grata, eliminating the character as readers know him. Did he go out in a blaze of glory? No, in typical woke fashion Frank Castle is captured by progressive heroes, chained up and forced to go through a struggle session in which he is admonished as a murderer and a terrorist. Marvel even brings the Punisher’s wife back from the dead, only so that she can divorce him and take his money and property, and then inform him that his lifelong crusade against the criminal underworld was all for nothing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/woke-marvel-eliminates-punisher-due-problematic-conservative-fan-base?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1547

[Melian]

[Bob Ireland]

*** After the indictment was unsealed Friday afternoon, Turley said on "America Reports" that the charges laid out are "extremely damning ***

Oh balderdash, Jonathan... only if they can prove them in a point of law. Me thinks your past associations may be clouding your judgment.

Think about it in general; Smith dropped all references to the 'records' violation because there are no criminal statutes there - AND previous federal court rulings specify that an ex-president has a right to possess his own papers.

Smith abandoned all legalfare mention of 'classified' because he stands to lose the argument that the president has exclusive right to declassify whatever he chooses.

Smith charges that the president has possession of documents that endanger national security - but he refuses to reveal the documents. How can Trump mount a defense if he is not allowed to see the evidence being used against him? Let us see how far that goes.

Trump is charged by Smith with obstruction of justice - but Smith has to show what crime is being protected... that is the nugget of his case.

Then Smith is charging 'conspiracy'; conspiring with whom? His personal aide? His attorneys? (Smith has attacked attorney client privilege; let's see how that plays in court.) Of course, 'conspiracy to commit a crime.' ...see above.

[bitt]

BREAKING: Attorneys representing UAP whistleblower David Grusch have formally ended their association and representation of the former intelligence officer who has claimed the U.S. has recovered "non-human" technology. https://t.co/4uBiTCjLK7— Tim McMillan (@LtTimMcMillan) June 10, 2023