Sotomayor is not very bright. This ruling allows a free people to stay true to their religious beliefs. Not all few businesses care one way or the other about what people are doing with their parts. It’s when the business is requested to do something that violates their life’s code, if you will.
When I did tutoring a few years back, I had a lesbian mother call me about tutoring her 12 year old daughter. She was definitely making her life choice obvious to me, for whatever reason. In any case, there’s no way I would turn away a young girl who needed help with reading. I helped her for a year. She was a quiet girl, and you could tell she felt very uncomfortable with her mother and her “partner.” She was clearly embarrassed. Nothing about this business arrangement compromised my beliefs.
Now, Natalie, OTOH, was asked to do wedding pics (she used to do some photography a few years back) by a lesbian couple as well. She had to tell them that, as a Christian, she just couldn’t do that. Fortunately, they accepted her position, which was surprising. In fact, they liked her and became customers at her market stand a year later.
So, it depends on the circumstances, Ms. Sotomayor. But that doesn’t fit her narrative, so whatever. Perhaps people practicing homosexuality should not be a protected class. They’re not exactly a race, or nationality.....how can a government protect a “sin” class when so many still recognize it as sin? That’s a losing proposition.
Yet she ever so humbly calls herself a "wise Latina."
“Sotomayor not bright!” LOL
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson does not know the meaning of a woman! LOL