☕️ VENOMOUS LORETTA ☙ Tuesday, May 30, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Comedians hold the line vs. trans censorship; Marshalls rescue kids; new study finds stuff that shouldn’t be in covid; study tackles the jabs over antibody shift; master chef SADS; bad CDC, and more
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/venomous-loretta-tuesday-may-30-2023
...
Here’s the knockout part of the study, right from the article’s abstract:
The SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein contains a neurotoxin-like region that has sequence similarities to the rabies virus and the HIV glycoproteins, as well as to snake neurotoxins, which interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes via this region.
Snake venom! The researchers discovered neurotoxic, snake venom-like genetic characteristics within the spike protein. It confirms Dr. Brian Ardis’ concerns, who faced ridicule and exclusion from medical freedom conferences after he discussed the similarities between the spike protein and snake venom on the Stew Peters show.
Somebody owes Brian Ardis an apology.
I’m only a lawyer, not a virologist, but I could not find a single other virus that has ever been described as having neurotoxic features similar to snake venom. Feel free to correct me, but it looks like a truly novel feature of this virus that supposedly somehow evolved naturally in a Chinese bat cave, at least according to human cockroach Tony Fauci. Maybe the snakes were getting cuddly with the bats or something.
You’d think scientists would be marveling at this evolutionary miracle that completely defies our understanding of how viruses evolve in the wild. You’d think. Instead, the scientists are strangely silent.
The study also demonstrated astonishing genetic similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and rabies — which coincidentally is a central nervous system antagonist much like snake venom — as well as recurring genetic characteristics resembling HIV. It is truly remarkable how nature really outdid itself, exhibiting wild creativity by evolving genetic features of rabies, snake venom, and the human immunodeficiency virus into the common cold within the evolutionary period of about a half nanosecond.
What are the odds? The unlikely chances for such natural convergent evolution in the coronavirus’s genetic makeup are negligible to the point of ludicrous impossibility. When will scientists stop dancing around the obvious so we can start seriously looking for WHO made the virus?
~~~~~~~
More at link...
~Easy
That is just sick, but is it sicker than this?
SICKEST clip you’ll see for weeks or months. Harvesting Babies to live forever.
Suddenly the Aztecs and Mayans are looking rather civilized in comparison.
Riddle me this, or correct me, since I have B.A. / M.A. and not a B.S/M.S degrees:
I’m not disputing that a Frankenstein virus was created, but wouldn’t such a virus likely create more havoc if it was released locally and in small spurts, such as via the “conspiracy theories” we read about Chinese people spraying stuff on apples at grocery stores?
I mean, can such a virus really survive replication over time, space, and millions of people and other variables?
Or would it survive better intact in a test tube and then for a half hour once released in limited airspace and surfaces?
Found elsewhere in the article you posted:
IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
Stew is a no holds barred broadcaster and is never to be ignored. After over 20 years on air you learn who is who and basically what they are doing. He may be a bit dictatorial but my search for perfection failed years ago.
Problem from here on out is we don't know what is coming at us next. It's like LL figured out a few hundred posts ago psyops are indeed working overtime.
I don't look for humans to have created all this medical madness designed to kill billions.I would look at AI. Feed enough data into a big enough bank of machines and there is no telling what pops up. And AI thrives on data. To me that's the real danger and will only get worse.