| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/01/2023 7:11:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
9/11 truther conspiracy not welcome on FR |
Posted on 04/30/2023 6:05:30 PM PDT by RandFan
@nomandatesco
Tucker talks 9/11– What happened to building 7?????
Clip ...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Your theory is absolute BS from an engineering perspective.
https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/
But congrats, you have enough gray matter to regurgitate your programmed narrative.
No doubt, and you won’t read the U of Alaska study, and you’ll keep vomiting your narrative.
“ALL DA STEEL FELL AT ONCE BECAUSE FIRE HOT!” Keep on truckin’
BWAHAHA
Truthers
The same clowns that said there were no planes.
They’re idiots.
And if you believe them so are you.
And again: WHERE ARE THE SCRIPTS?!
Answer that.
Hi goofy, it’s IMPOSSIBLE for the a steel framed structure to fall like that with the explanation provided.
You have to cognitively process reality. It’s called evidence based thought. In other words, science.
You’re just driven by an irrational demand that your narrative be correct, to the point where you ignore evidence that’s in front of your face. It’s called ‘normalcy bias’ in psychology, which often drifts into ‘cognitive dissonance’.
Good luck!
No. It’s impossible for it to collapse with the LIE you keep putting out as the explanation. But that’s NOT THE EXPLANATION.
So you’re an idiot.
And a liar.
“It’s like only #7 matters.
I wonder why that is.”
For me, the issue is the free fall collapse at the beginning. I can’t see how that can happen from fire or falling debris.
There is a group of architects and engineers that have the same problem.
Hulsey is 9/11 truthers who believes WTC 7 was taken down by demoltion. No thanks.
The ONLY rational conclusion is that it was taken down by demolition.
You think all the steel columns failed at once and it fell on its own footprint! From some little fires?
That is literally impossible.
There. You finally said it. It took ONLY twenty posts to get there. Not surprising, since the admins and moderators do not like 9/11 truthers here.
This is another reason why I don't like what passes for a conspiracy theorist these days.
They act like con men and get mad when they realize their marks know the con better than themselves.
LOL. Woah, I FINALLY the most obvious thing in the history of engineering? You’re amazing, Sherlock Holmes.
But seriously. Explain how every steel column simultaneously fails all the way to the ground in seconds, from a few small fires?
You can’t. Because it quite literally cannot happen. That’s why steel buildings are great. And why your brain is not.
Why would you think that?
I find it difficult for 44 people to be cowed by 4 rag heads with box cutters.
After the TV lied about basically everything for the last 7 years, you still believe the TV about 9/11?
Maybe there were no planes at all.
Big deal I was wrong about the number of people on board. You really think a few dozen people will be cowed by 4 ragheads with box cutters?
Because it was professionally demolished.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT9D - width of around 13ft.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_CF6 8.5 - 9.5ft
That little engine *might* be an APU.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.