Sounds like it written by idiots.
“Sounds like it written by idiots.”
Can’t help saying it, but here goes...”Indeed it was.”
And yes, journalism has sunk this far. And will go lower until we resolve things...in a manner that journalists will not like.
Really. What’s different from a semi-auto deer rifle?
The magazine? You can modify many with high capacity.
>Sounds like it written by idiots.
Chatbot 2.0
“Sounds like it written by idiots.”
I’m so thankful that the AR-15 is the only truly deadly rifle.
Wooden stock rifles, of course, only work on animals, not humans. And, of course, the .223 ammunition used in the AR-15 is knows to be the most super powerful ammunition ever. So powerful that it is not even allowed in hunting rifles, which use safe-for-humans ammunition.
I have a theory when a multi-author piece is presented by the AP, WaPo, NYT, or other MSM site that the stupidity of the piece is in direct proportion to the number of authors. This has 14 contributing reporters and 12 text editors. I don't know if a scale exists that is large enough to measure this level of stupidity.
Absolute idiots displaying their ignorance of guns.
By idiots, for idiots.
It was. Notice they don't even sign their names to this drivel? Who the heck is "Washington Post Staff"? These bipedal debris have names.