In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled “I Was Severely Injured by the Moderna Vaccine” – Former Pussycat Dolls Member Shares Her Vaccine Injury Story (VIDEO), newzjunkey wrote: You’re obsessively anti vax. That’s fine for you. Absolute statements that the tech is “not safe” are clearly untrue.
How about demonstrably unsafe for most people as of this date - further information coming?
I’ve had three Modena shots and no issues that I’m aware of after the first day. I’m not alone. You’ll no doubt tell me I just don’t know how my dna is being rewritten.
If the 'vaccine' is functioning as intended, then many changes are occurring and DNA modifications have been documented.
Not every human being’s body reacts the same way. Most aren’t allergic to penicillin or sulfa antibiotics but plenty are. Most have no issues with flu vaccines but some do.
It's unfortunate that the pharmas included known allergens (i.e., PEG) in their 'vaccines'. But the entire strategy of using gene therapy that indiscriminately deposits proteins throughout the body, including vital organs, was never suitable. The spike proteins are toxic and collect in the ovaries, heart, lung etc. and the body's immune system then 'learns' to attack those regions. Not an appropriate strategy, ever.
The test for bio accummulation of spike proteins in organs would have taken pharma's 24 hours to conduct and would be a critical factor in showing one reason the 'vaccines' are not safe. But pharma didn't do that industry standard test. Japan refused to buy until they saw that test conducted/results and it showed spike proteins in heart, lungs, ovaries, testes etc.
So your assertion that not everybody has the same reaction is irrelevant because the circulatory system is not 'too customized' to say that some people will be harmed and others won't. I'm grateful you don't have symptoms yet and hope you never get any. But that is zero assurance that you are safe. This rush to proclaim them safe seems like an attempt to do so before evidence has time to show up.
I will note my doctor suggested I stick with Modena rather than get Pfizer for my next booster.
I hope you reconsider. Mortality is being under reported to the CDC's VAERS database, but of reports of death after 'vaccination' show that Moderna has about 1 report of death per each of Pfizer deaths. I believe Pfizer was far more prevalent in administration counts - it used to be about 7 Pfizers to 1 Moderna.
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
The shots weren’t to keep you from ever being infected but to prevent severe illness.
Not true. True 'vaccines' confer immunity. This became a problem for the CDC when the Covid 'vaccines' were not doing so - so the CDC rewrote the definition of 'vacccine' on their gov website and stressed they were to help you reduce severity. The FDA filings show that the Covid 'vaccines' were never tested to see if they reduce mortality, spread, etc. All we were told was lies. The FEC filing acknowledged that the mRNA is in fact gene therapy but to avoid undue public concern, the products would be registered as 'vaccines'.
The pneumonia and flu vaccines are similarly targeted to reduce severity. Your mileage may vary. Because of the variations in humans there’s few absolutes in how each person will react to a medicine.
The Covid, pneumonia and flu vaccines have zero evidence that they reduce severity - just more failed/fake products. These are unsafe 'vaccines'.
The chart below shows all deaths reported to the CDC following vaccination for the last 30 years. The Covid deaths are inexcusably off-the-charts.
