In indicting FR, you are correct.
In invoking “the cabal”, you are a bit ethereal since even you don’t know who or what comprises the cabal.
Yet, neither do the Anons.
In variably, I ask questions such as:
Is the info given consistent with current knowledge?
Is the info well thought out or researched?
Is it presented without pretense?
Is the outlet grifting (based on their influence/popularity) for “followers” or performing “outreach” for clicks?
Is the outlet grifting (based on their influence/popularity) for money?
BLM \is\ doing good work but they are an ‘exclusive club’ hiding behind an “anon-like” curtain.
They grift and claim capitalism as their excuse.
Yet, I still I caution their use in a very broad-sense.
Anons don’t work like that (see my follow-up post)
BLM, WTM and ‘Rebs’ are an exclusive club and are divisive.
By calling themselves a unifying group, they actually divide.
By-the-way, BLM, WTM and ‘Rebs” are inter-related, birthed from one another and serve the same purposes.
What’s “rebs”?