In the end, it comes down to a Quia or Quatenus subscription.
The Word of God (St. John 1:1) is inspired and inerrant.
It does not return empty and is used for teaching and reprimanding; it is the Foundation of saving grace.
It is inspired by the Holy Spirit and protected by God, inerrant through time.
Quia = \Is\ the Word of God
Quatenus - Contains the Word of God.
By the way, Toddler, your statement, “doctrinally true to the original Greek manuscripts” is not a proper use.
Doctrine is the explanation and application of Scripture, translations have the burden of being Scripturally correct, not doctrinally.
Doctrine can be extracted from anything someone calls Scripture.
Exegesis v. Eisegesis as I have explained previously.
I think I need to clarify something. It doesn't matter what i believe or don't believe.
My objective is to explain the cabal the best way I can. If you can explain how I'm mistaken about the Babylonian mystics concept of the ancient writings that is great. i want to hear it.
When i say Elohim MIGHT be aliens. This is how I interpret their belief. Because they do NOT believe they're human. They believe they're the Elohim.
Let me show you:
This is an orthodox Jewish lady explaining how they're the Elohim. (the original post was removed.)
Please don't get upset with this lady. I know she isn't cabal. Though a lot of the teaching are similar. She has been showing me a lot about how the Cabal thinks.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XvJEPfyMxO6b/ Now look at the term America again. It's a concept of a cherubim (Stars/Angels.) Amaruca means land of the Amaru in Peru.
Do you see why they had to cover this up? They're the white gods. Or I should say they think they're the white gods.
Again. It doesn't matter what you or i think. I'm trying to explain how the cabal thinks. I understand neither of us agree with cannibalism or any of their other BS.
Linking the Elohim to other words sounds like a stretch but I no longer think it is. Given what they believe.
This is my personal belief:
We can't travel faster then the speed of light. Which means there are no aliens that visit us.
THEY believe:
1. They are gods.
2. Sol and Sirius is binary. When a binary star comes to us. That changes everything. That is a simple hop within our solar system.
Discussion:
Every 24 thousand years or so we get a major change in the human species.
Important: Cranial capacity doesn't decrees with evolution.
Example: 35 thousand years ago was Cro-Magnon and Homo Capensis which both had a larger Cranial capacity then ours.
Which means we devolved or mated. Likely a hybrid from these species. Which sounds like the Gilgamesh story to me. Gilgamesh female slave mated with a lower species.
Cro-Magnon and Homo Capensis with larger cranial capacity then ours today didn't just appear. One of two things happened:
1. God placed them here in a similar story as in Adam and Eve.
2. Maybe those that believe they're the Elohim also think they came from the binary star. (This post is long. I will show more to this later.)
I'm simply trying to figure out who the Cabal think they are.
I would rather they were not in our lives at all. But they're and we should understand them. For thousands of years we've had our heads in the sand.
ransomnote: I know what you're thinking.
no alien stuff.
They believing in a Binary star I believe is critical to understanding them.
This will be the last word on it if that is what you wish.
By the way, Toddler, your statement, “doctrinally true to the original Greek manuscripts” is not a proper use.Semantics aside what I was saying is that no orthodox doctrine is affected by the issues with the Textus Receptus. One commonly accepted debate technique is to interpret the other person's statement in the kindest light of what they are trying to convey rather than attacking them based on minutia and semantics.
Exegesis v. Eisegesis as I have explained previously.
I am perfectly conversant with the difference between exegesis and eisegesis. It does not apply in this instance as exegesis is allowing the text to speak for itself and extracting the meaning which it naturally conveys. Eisegesis is reading into the text an agenda which one brings with them and attempting to make the text unnaturally conform to that agenda, Hardly what I did by not being perfectly clear in my communication
I request that those engaging in an interesting religious debate move the discussions to Festival. I don’t know who is still actively pursuing the topic so I just grabbed a few names that were posting earlier - please ignore this post if you’ve already dropped off.
We do have religious debate(s) derailing the thread right now, and although the topic is important, it can be a distraction and/or needlessly divisive for those not seeking religious debate content on the Q thread. Hence, I request the move to Festival, and I’ve already had our security forces ensure the facilities are safe and well lit. ThankQ