Uh, no.
I have worked in a STEM field for nearly 30 years, and I know what a scientific study is.
I also know what a highly flawed statistical analysis is. I use them all the time -- because in a lot of my work that is the best we have. When I use these resources I include many caveats and disclaimers in my project documentation so the readers know the limitations of what I'm producing. I often warn my clients NOT to make major, consequential decisions on the basis of this work -- but to instead use this work as a foundation for something much more detailed, comprehensive and definitive.
You asked for links and I provided multiple ones from multiple sources each using their own methodology. All arrived at generally the same conclusion.
So, instead of just asking for evidence tell me exactly what the criteria are before you'll consider the results valid.
You're rejecting the best efforts of hundreds of medical and scientific organizations around the world, all indicating a significant benefit from the vaccines, so tell me what you will accept.
Also, do you have evidence that the vaccines are ineffective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths? Or has no one done an adequate study yet so we just can't know?