“to join our consciousness and bodies with us so they can experience physical life on this planet. For some strange reason, it requires our acquiescence.”
I wanted to comment on this very interesting element of the phenomenon.
Many folks miss this since it does not fit in with their own “narrative”, and I am impressed you caught it.
McKenna, Vallee, Keel are among the folks who argued that the aliens and we are linked in some way—and are not separate or separable.
This is totally opposed to the “nuts and bolts” “aliens are from outer space” way of looking at this.
I think we will learn a lot more about this sooner than many think—and the McKenna, Vallee, Keel school will be proven correct.
I have stayed away from the “aliens—demons” discussion because I think it is a “solution” template that is very premature—we have nowhere near enough data and analysis to reach any conclusions about this stuff.
The business analogy is applicable here. If you have a “mystery” or “major problem” in business you do not start with assumptions about the conclusion—you carefully look at the data, develop alternative analytic approaches, do the work and test the hypothesis, and only then even consider what the possible “solution” to the problem is.
Discussing “solutions” before you understand the “problem” is just a basic error—always to be avoided.
Yep. I also go back to Sun Tzu's "Know your enemy."
Mis-defining or misunderstanding a problem can almost always lead to trouble.
I tend to encourage the use of the root word "daemons/daimons" instead if only because it is a description of some kind of ethereal being (of which we still know nothing) positioned between God on one extreme and humans on the other.