Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: M_Continuum

Interesting that you mention the idea of “aliens” taking over human bodies. Whitley Strieber (who is certainly wacky at times) has mentioned that he was “told” that such was the goal of these so-called “aliens”...and that is to join our consciousness and bodies with us so they can experience physical life on this planet. For some strange reason, it requires our acquiescence.


176 posted on 02/02/2023 2:32:41 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

I was wondering if was too late and nobody would know what that was 😂
So more like the Tok’ra, needs a willing host? This is the book you linked? sounds wacky, but interesting. We would be walking, talking space suits.


179 posted on 02/02/2023 3:05:14 AM PST by M_Continuum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

“to join our consciousness and bodies with us so they can experience physical life on this planet. For some strange reason, it requires our acquiescence.”

I wanted to comment on this very interesting element of the phenomenon.

Many folks miss this since it does not fit in with their own “narrative”, and I am impressed you caught it.

McKenna, Vallee, Keel are among the folks who argued that the aliens and we are linked in some way—and are not separate or separable.

This is totally opposed to the “nuts and bolts” “aliens are from outer space” way of looking at this.

I think we will learn a lot more about this sooner than many think—and the McKenna, Vallee, Keel school will be proven correct.

I have stayed away from the “aliens—demons” discussion because I think it is a “solution” template that is very premature—we have nowhere near enough data and analysis to reach any conclusions about this stuff.

The business analogy is applicable here. If you have a “mystery” or “major problem” in business you do not start with assumptions about the conclusion—you carefully look at the data, develop alternative analytic approaches, do the work and test the hypothesis, and only then even consider what the possible “solution” to the problem is.

Discussing “solutions” before you understand the “problem” is just a basic error—always to be avoided.


192 posted on 02/02/2023 8:12:15 AM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson