Listen to the clip, carefully.
SA never admits error in his choice.
Never admits error in his reasoning for subtly boosting the vaxx.
Never apologizes for implying that he was intellectually above those who chose NOT to vaxx.
He just chalks it up as a “win for us”; only ONCE saying “I lost.”
It’s a competition?
If I came out of bar and found him rolling on the ground on fire, I wouldn’t pee on him to save his life.
He can rot in Hell.
I thought the video was a bizarre rant. I never thought of the vax decision like a game to win or lose. Most people in my family took the vax to my consternation believing the government propaganda or choosing to comply so they could go on a planned vacation overseas. I sure don’t feel like I won anything but dread the ramifications of the vax on my loved one. Now I’m the one sending them information on the NAC/Bromelain spike protein counter measures and probably still looking like a kook. But that goes with the territory.
Yeah. I watched him this morning. Lots of weaseling an over-rationalizing.
I was also watching him when he got the shot and explained why he did it. Now that his trophy wife is gone he’s not so confident about that decision.
Just once in the history of Leftist Insanity, the commies wanted to be correct. Just once. Never happened before. Still hasn't happened.
But they are willing to slaughter Six or Seven Billion people for the opportunity to say, "the Left was right."
Our betters are stereotyped in the movie "Trading Places," where Randolph and Mortimer Duke make $1 bets with each other. They are in lukewarm competition with one another, briefly jockeying for being the wealthier or smarter, without fear or regard for any consequences of being on the "shorter end of stick." They and their families would always be wealthy beyond the ability of even upper income society to comprehend.
In the 2016 US election, the PTB pitted two sets of bloodline children against one another. Both HRC and DJT had the kind of pedigrees (also containing multiple secrets) which would allow them to get their respective nominations. If the Dems were going to win by cheating, so be it. For the elites, that's all part of the jockeying and reason to clink glasses when a victor is declared.
If a socially hobnobbing realty genius and billionaire could win by smartly putting together tough administration players willing (mostly) to "play by the book," more power to him--for the time being. The leash could always rein him in--they believed, later to become crestfallen.
But as insurance against uncontrolled longevity, both nominees were once-again saddled with very compromised VP nominees. Despite Pence's squeaky clean image, his dirty past would allow him to do whatever the string-pullers might eventually require of him. Both were in the mold of Captain Edward John Smith, who would dutifully go down with the Titanic, as his Jesuit Master, Father Browne, had made clear he must as the latter disembarked the ship at Belfast, the last port of call before the crossing.
Tim Kaine was the same kind of player--deeply compromised. As has been joked that no one would dare to be President with HRC as a VP, the same actually applied in a less famous way with Tim Kaine.
Both VPs had--just as Captain Smith did--Secret Society backgrounds which had multiple layers of sworn death oaths. No such oath is more serious that could be brought to bear on either Pence or Kaine, whoever would successfully rise to the US Vice Presidency. It might be life-or-death for an installed leader, but for the top-tier string-pullers, those have always considered themselves well insulated, where they merely lost a $1 bet.