No. Many more.
Yes
Malcom Forbes is turning over in his grave.
Wouldn’t Bruce Lee writing in Forbes be sort of a blog? Or in a publication that early on touted the efficacy of vaccines to prevent infection, just sort of an advertisement?
Forbes, HOW MANY of the articles that you produced were ever Peer-reviewed?
I guess propaganda doesn’t need peer reviewed.
We didn’t need to be scientists to know masks were garbage and we don’t need to be scientists to see that people are dropping off suddenly.
Data14 compiled by the International Olympic Committee show 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under age 35 between 1966 and 2004, giving us an average annual rate of 29 sudden deaths, across all sports. Meanwhile, between March 2021 and March 2022 alone — a single year — at least 769 athletes have suffered cardiac arrest, collapse, and/or have died on the field, worldwide.15
Among EU FIFA (football/soccer ball) athletes, sudden death increased by 420% in 2021.
Good Sciencing, which is keeping a running total of athletic deaths post-jab puts the current number of cardiac arrests at 1,090 and total deaths at 715.16 Several dozen more are pending confirmation that the athlete had in fact received the shot.
Among EU FIFA (football/soccer ball) athletes, sudden death increased by 420% in 2021.17 Historically, about five soccer players have died while playing the game each year. Between January and mid-November 2021, 21 FIFA players died from sudden death.
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/the-explosive-rise-of-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-sads/
I don’t know but before covid, young people dying on a sports field were few and far between.
Don’t believe your lying eyes, feel with your heart.
Woke Physics.
Forbes: majority stake owned by China.
Read the comments.
Yup-—Forbes and Fortune are the go-to places for truth these days. (sarc)
Carlson, who is not a professional athlete, not a professional medical doctor, and not a professional scientist, suggested that there’s been a trend of more athletes suffering cardiac arrest.
They are correct that Carlson is none of those three professions. However, none of those three professions have anything to do with statistics or numbers, which is what he was talking about.
Hmm, does this sound like McCullough, a cardiologist who was not really known as an infectious disease expert or a public health researcher before the pandemic...
Again--McCullough was talking about cardiac arrests--not infectious disease.
Forbes was very skillful in smearing two people by telling us who they are NOT. Forbes did nothing to tell us why they are wrong.
Bruce Y. Lee is nothing more than a propaganda spreader, and may even be a Covid spreader.
(Said in my best dubbed voice ala GAME OF DEATH): “You win, Bruce Y Lee! Take sixth booster as your rewahhhhhd! ohhhwaaaah!”
Who the hell is Bruce Y. Lee and why should anyone give a damn?
Bruce needs to listen to Dr. Naomi Wolf, Ed Dowd, and a dozen others that are orders of magnitude sharper than Whiney Bruce.
Just laughing! Journalism has been at it’s best the last few years. This is a great example.
If you suggest that Covid “vaccines” are killing people, you better be ready and able to prove it? Why not have to prove that Covid “vaccines” are not causing deaths. Why is the burden of proof upon those who suspect that excess mortality may be due to “vaccines” made by a newer messenger RNA methodology? Why do I have to prove that it is harmful if I don’t want to be injected with it? When are they going to bring the evidence that Covid “Vaccines” are harmless?
It’s like the Nigerian prince who asks for my account number, I don’t know that he is a fraud, and I can’t prove it. Does that mean that I should not ask him to prove he is actually a Nigerian prince before I give him my bank account information?
The fact that there are not any verifiable numbers is part of the deception.
If the numbers were good for vaxinc, MSM would show us. Those numbers would be shared broadly and loudly, probably with a live ticker showing that recent death rate is the same as it ever was.
Thus one can conclude that the numbers are bad for vaxinc, since they say there is no data.
Vaxinc is the side that needs to come with proof because they are known liars. Everything and anything they say without verifiable proof should be doubted and discarded since they have knowingly lied many times.
Also, one may wonder why it is hard to get good data. Primarily because the monitoring systems are feeble. However, they are performing just as they were designed to do.
If vaxinc or BigPharma wanted effective safety monitoring we would have it. Its absence is more evidence that vaxinc and BigPharma should be considered unreliable witnesses. E.g., liars.
