Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber
Rush was wont to say that man couldn't cause Global Warming even if he tried. Which put me to wondering, just how much energy would it take to heat up the whole of earth's atmosphere by just one degree, and what would it take to create that much energy. So I looked up the details and ran the numbers.


According to NASA, earth's atmosphere weighs 5.1e+18 kg (comes to ~5,600 trillion US tons).

According to The Engineering Toolbox, it takes 1006 Joules (of energy) to change the temperature of one kilogram of air by one degree Celsius (or Kelvin).*

1006 Joules/kg/°C per 5.1e+18 kg comes to 5.712e+21 Joules to raise the temperature of earth's atmosphere by a single °C (or °K).

5.712e+21 Joules converts to 1.425 trillion Mega-Watt hours.

The largest nukular reactor in the US (in Palo Verde, Ariz.) can produce 3937 Mega-Watts if all three reactors are running @100%.
Running @100% 24/7/365, in a year's time, Palo Verde would make 34,488,120 MWh.

Running at 34,488,120 MWh per year, Palo Verde would need 41,323 years to produce the 1.425 trillion MWh needed to raise the temp of earth's atmosphere by one degree C (1.8 °F).
FREE photo hosting by Host Pic.Org - Free Image Picture Photo Hosting

Or to put it in another perspective, the Global Cooling Scare began about 1970. If we had brought enough reactors online that year in a deliberate effort to raise earth's atmosphere's temperature by 1°C (or 1°K, or 1.8°F) by running them @100% 24/7/365 until today, and converted ALL of that electrical output into heat, we would have had to build 780 Palo Verde-sized reactors (assumes 100% efficiency in the conversion).

Today there are only (roughly) 220 commercial nuclear power plants on the planet.

To put that in Imperial measurements (1°C = 1.8°F), Palo Verde would need 22,957 years to make enough MWh that if converted 100% to atmospheric heat could raise earth's temperature by 1°F.
Or if we had started in 1970, it would have taken 434 Palo Verde-sized reactors to raise earth's temperature by 1°F by 2023.

This obviously is an unfathomably YUGE amount of energy, far in excess of what a gas that comprises a whopping 0.04% of our atmosphere could be responsible for.


* Yes, I am aware this specific heat value only applies to air @sea level pressure but the scale of final answer is so absurd that I couldn't be bothered to find a mean value.

9 posted on 01/16/2023 5:08:22 AM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paal Gulli

if only we knew of an energy source so large that it could warm the earth for us at no cost.... hmmmm... i should apply for a government grant.


13 posted on 01/16/2023 5:49:35 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Paal Gulli

But but but you didn’t figure in cars or planes or factories or fireplaces or motorcycles or lawnmowers or weed eaters or trucks or gas stoves

/s
/s


15 posted on 01/16/2023 6:07:31 AM PST by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson