Oh, yet another FRoctor.
Here is the link to the article Mr. MD:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29528905/
Not sure what medical schools you and the esteemed gas_dr attended, but a basic cardiology course was certainly not offered; myocarditis is not “transitory” in most cases.
Read the whole article (a literature review) and then we can have an intelligent discussion my good FRoctor.
The key word you are missing fraud doc yourself is “causes” of the myocarditis which which would then go on to develop into cardiomyopathy as the article desscribes.
It has to be established that covid or vaccine causes a myocarditis that goes onto develop cardiomyopathy at a rate greater than the 1/3rd the article suggests regular myocarditis may develop into. The article lists other factors that go into deveopment of cardiomyopathy beyond the initial myocarditis state. Cardiac tissue biopsy was listed as important to establish cause.
You are connecting covid or vaccines with a myocarditis that may lead to cardiomyopathy in 1/3 of cases but the article was written in 2018. It hasn’t been established yet that covid or vaccine induced myocarditis will even lead to the type of 1/3rd cardiomyopathy rate that the 2018 “opinion” article(yes listed in the article’s header section) describes.
The article also calls itself a “summarization of studies”. Which means the final opinion summaries haven’t themselves been fully vetted. The article lists no controls or known viral causes of myocarditis well known to be a factor in development of cardiomyopathy.(Cox sackie b being one nortorious example)
Swing and Miss!
I’m not a doctor but a working trauma nurse, 36 years in...but thanks for the promotion.